This past Thursday the Supreme Court issued one of the most important decisions in a voting rights case in years, reaching a surprising 5-4 decision that requires the State of Alabama to re-do its Congressional map because it limited the power of black voters. It also issued an important decision permitting a nursing home patient to sue his nursing home under federal civil rights law. But neither of those was the most interesting case issued this week. No, that prize goes to what news reports have summarized as the “poop themed” squeaky toy versus Jack Daniel’s case, in which the court sided with the maker of Jack Daniel’s whiskey over the manufacturer of a similarly-styled dog toy. This was
Hence then, the article about judicial follies bad dog good court was published today ( ) and is available onUkiah Daily Journal ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Judicial Follies: Bad Dog! Good Court! )