Reviewing SwimSwam’s 2026 NCAA Event Predictions – Women’s Edition ...Middle East

swimswam - Sport
Reviewing SwimSwam’s 2026 NCAA Event Predictions – Women’s Edition

By James Sutherland on SwimSwam

2026 NCAA Division I Women’s Swimming and Diving Championships

Wednesday, March 18 – Saturday, March 21, 2026 McAuley Aquatic Center, Atlanta, GA Championship Central Preview Index Psych Sheet Live Results

The Women’s and Men’s NCAA Division I Championships are arguably the most unpredictable meets of the year, but we do our best to forecast what’s to come in each event before chaos takes over on two Wednesday nights every March.

    2026 Women’s NCAA Preview Index

    In the women’s meet, which wrapped up just over a week ago, we correctly picked seven of the eight finalists (or top eight finishers) in 10 of the 18 events, while we were a perfect eight-for-eight in one race.

    The relays were a strong point in our previews, as we picked the top eight correctly in the 400 free relay and went seven-for-eight in three of the four other team events.

    In two cases, Louisville in the 200 free relay and Cal in the 200 medley relay, one of our top-eight picks was disqualified after initially posting a time that would’ve made the top eight.

    We picked six of the eight finalists in six events—interestingly enough, all four 100s and the 400 IM, plus the 200 free relay. The event we did the worst in was the 200 breast, where we only got five of the eight finalists correct.

    Overall, in our previews, we picked 120 of the 144 finalists or top eight finishers correctly (83.3%), a significant improvement from last year, where we went 107/144 (74.31%).

    Below, find our top eight picks in each event, along with where the swimmer/relay team finished. We’ve also included who finished in the top eight we didn’t predict under “Moving In,” and the number in the bottom right of each event indicates how well we did in picking the top eight.

    1650 Freestyle

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Jillian Cox (Texas) 1st 2 Kennedi Dobson (Georgia) 6th 3 Gena Jorgenson (Kentucky) 4th 4 Claire Weinstein (Cal) 2nd 5 Katie Grimes (Virginia) 3rd 6 Mila Nikanorov (Ohio State) 5th 7 Kate Hurst (Texas) 8th 8 Cavan Gormsen (Virginia) 13th Moving In Thilda Haell (Louisville) Correct Top 8: 7/8

    200 Medley Relay

    PREDICTED FINISH TEAM ACTUAL FINISH 1 Virginia 1st 2 Louisville 2nd 3 Stanford 2nd 4 Tennessee 4th 5 Michigan 6th 6 Cal DQ (touched 5th) 7 Alabama 8th 8 NC State 5th Moving In Texas Correct Top 8: 7/8

    800 Freestyle Relay

    PREDICTED FINISH TEAM ACTUAL FINISH 1 Virginia 1st 2 Michigan 4th 3 Cal 3rd 4 Stanford 6th 5 Texas 2nd 6 Indiana 5th 7 Georgia 9th 8 USC 7th Moving In Tennessee Correct Top 8: 7/8

    100 Butterfly

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Torri Huske (Stanford) 1st 2 Claire Curzan (Virginia) 2nd 3 Alex Shackell (Indiana) 3rd 4 Gigi Johnson (Stanford) 4th 5 Miranda Grana (Indiana) 8th 6 Mizuki Hirai (Tennessee) 6th 7 Leah Shackley (NC State) 17th 8 Brady Kendall (Michigan) 20th Moving In Annie Jia (Cal), Campbell Stoll (Texas) Correct Top 8: 6/8

    400 IM

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Bella Sims (Michigan) 1st 2 Caroline Bricker (Stanford) 6th 3 Lucy Bell (Stanford) 2nd 4 Katie Grimes (Virginia) 5th 5 Ella Jansen (Tennessee) 4th 6 Leah Hayes (Virginia) 10th 7 Aimee Canny (Virginia) 8th 8 Hannah Bellard (Michigan) 13th Moving In Teagan O’Dell (Cal), Rosie Murphy (UCLA) Correct Top 8: 6/8

    200 Freestyle

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Anna Moesch (Virginia) 1st 2 Minna Abraham (USC) 4th 3 Claire Weinstein (Cal) 8th 4 Liberty Clark (Indiana) 2nd 5 Stephanie Balduccini (Michigan) 9th 6 Mia West (Cal) 7th 7 Nikolett Padar (Texas) 3rd 8 Madi Mintenko (Virginia) 5th Moving In Camille Spink (Tennessee) Correct Top 8: 7/8

    100 Breaststroke

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Eneli Jefimova (Virginia) 1st 2 Anastasia Gorbenko (Louisville) 4th 3 Anita Bottazzo (Florida) 2nd 4 McKenzie Siroky (Tennessee) 2nd 5 Letitia Sim (Michigan) 10th 6 Mackenzie Lung (Fresno State) 15th 7 Emma Weber (Virginia) 7th 8 Joleigh Crye (Cincinnati) 8th Moving In Piper Enge (Texas), Maria Ramos Najji (Ohio State) Correct Top 8: 6/8

    200 Freestyle Relay

    PREDICTED FINISH TEAM ACTUAL FINISH 1 Virginia 1st 2 Stanford 2nd 3 Louisville DQ (touched 2nd) 4 Michigan 4th 5 Indiana 3rd 6 Cal 5th 7 Tennessee 6th 8 Alabama 9th Moving In Texas, NC State Correct Top 8: 6/8

    100 Backstroke

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Claire Curzan (Virginia) 1st 2 Bella Sims (Michigan) 2nd 3 Erika Pelaez (NC State) 4th 4 Miranda Grana (Indiana) 14th 5 Mary-Ambre Moluh (Cal) 4th 6 Maggie Wanezek (Wisconsin) 2nd 7 Leah Shackley (NC State) 6th 8 Jillian Crooks (Tennessee) 19th Moving In Claire Jansen (Pitt), Emily Jones (Alabama) Correct Top 8: 6/8

    200 Breaststroke

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Lucy Bell (Stanford) 1st 2 Aimee Canny (Virginia) 2nd 3 Anastasia Gorbenko (Louisville) 3rd 4 Eneli Jefimova (NC State) 27th 5 Mackenzie Lung (Fresno State) 29th 6 Kaelyn Gridley (Duke) 3rd 7 Letitia Sim (Michigan) 5th 8 Mia Cheatwood (Louisville) 10th Moving In Grace Rabb (Florida), Anita Bottazzo (Florida), Emma Weber (Virginia) Correct Top 8: 5/8

    500 Freestyle

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Jillian Cox (Texas) 2nd 2 Kennedi Dobson (Georgia) 3rd 3 Claire Weinstein (Cal) 1st 4 Katie Grimes (Virginia) 11th 5 Hannah Bellard (Michigan) 7th 6 Cavan Gormsen (Virginia) 6th 7 Julie Brousseau (Florida) 5th 8 Ella Jansen (Tennessee) 4th Moving In Madi Mintenko (Virginia) Correct Top 8: 7/8

    50 Freestyle

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Torri Huske (Stanford) 1st 2 Sara Curtis (Virginia) 2nd 3 Camille Spink (Tennessee) 3rd 4 Julia Dennis (Louisville) 5th 5 Brady Kendall (Michigan) 7th 6 Eva Okaro (Texas) 4th 7 Anna Moesch (Virginia) 8th 8 Annam Olasewere (Stanford) 12th Moving In Liberty Clark (Indiana) Correct Top 8: 7/8

    400 Medley Relay

    PREDICTED FINISH TEAM ACTUAL FINISH 1 Virginia 1st 2 Tennessee 2nd 3 Michigan 3rd 4 Stanford 9th 5 NC State 4th 6 Louisville 8th 7 Cal 6th 8 Indiana 7th Moving In Texas Correct Top 8: 7/8

    200 IM

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Anastasia Gorbenko (Louisville) 4th 2 Lucy Bell (Stanford) 1st 3 Mia West (Cal) 3rd 4 Teagan O’Dell (Cal) 2nd 5 Angie Coe (Texas) 9th 6 Aimee Canny (Virginia) 6th 7 Campbell Chase (Texas) 5th 8 Leah Hayes (Virginia) 7th Moving In Rosie Murphy (UCLA) Correct Top 8: 7/8

    100 Freestyle

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Torri Huske (Stanford) 1st 2 Anna Moesch (Virginia) 2nd 3 Camille Spink (Tennessee) 5th 4 Sara Curtis (Virginia) 3rd 5 Liberty Clark (Indiana) 4th 6 Julia Dennis (Louisville) 8th 7 Eva Okaro (Texas) 9th 8 Stephanie Balduccini (Michigan) 11th Moving In Mary-Ambre Moluh (Cal), Cadence Vincent (Alabama) Correct Top 8: 6/8

    200 Butterfly

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Hannah Bellard (Michigan) 3rd 2 Alex Shackell (Indiana) 2nd 3 Tess Howley (Virginia) 4th 4 Campbell Stoll (Texas) 1st 5 Caroline Bricker (Stanford) 5th 6 Emily Brown (Tennessee) 6th 7 Ella Jansen (Tennessee) 7th 8 Carli Cronk (Notre Dame) 10th Moving In Lilou Ressencourt (Cal) Correct Top 8: 7/8

    200 Backstroke

    PREDICTED FINISH SWIMMER ACTUAL FINISH 1 Claire Curzan (Virginia) 1st 2 Bella Sims (Michigan) 5th 3 Maggie Wanezek (Wisconsin) 2nd 4 Miranda Grana (Indiana) 8th 5 Erika Pelaez (NC State) 3rd 6 Teagan O’Dell (Cal) 6th 7 Leah Shackley (NC State) 7th 8 Catie Choate (Florida) 16th Moving In Claire Jansen (Pitt) Correct Top 8: 7/8

    400 Freestyle Relay

    PREDICTED FINISH TEAM ACTUAL FINISH 1 Virginia 1st 2 Michigan 6th 3 Louisville 7th 4 Stanford 2nd 5 Cal 4th 6 Indiana 5th 7 Texas 3rd 8 Tennessee 8th Moving In Correct Top 8: 8/8

    TAKEAWAYS

    Texas led all teams with five top-eight finishes that we didn’t predict at Women’s NCAAs, three of which came in relays. Seeded outside of the top eight in all three, the Longhorns posted the fastest time out of the early heats in the 200 medley (1:33.38), 200 free (1:26.42) and 400 medley (3:24.64) relays, ultimately placing 5th overall in the 400 medley while setting a new program record and adding a pair of 7th-place finishes in the two 200 relays. Texas also placed 2nd in the 800 free relay (6:46.91) and 3rd in the 400 free relay (3:07.02), both in school record fashion, giving them 142 relay points after they were seeded for 107. Texas also had Piper Enge place 5th in the 100 breast after not being selected in the top eight, while Campbell Stoll cracked the ‘A’ final of the 100 fly (7th) after not being picked. Perhaps even more notably, Stoll won the title in the 200 fly after she was picked to finish 4th. Texas freestyle was on fire throughout the meet, with freshman Nikolett Padar notably moving up to finish 3rd in the 200 free after we picked her 7th. She was also the top seed out of the prelims, and led off the Texas 800 free relay (that finished 2nd after they were picked 5th) with a time of 1:40.30 to rank her #6 all-time in the 200 free. The Longhorns’ 400 free relay that finished 3rd was also a big jump up after they were picked 7th. That performance saw them finish just four points back of Stanford for 2nd in the team race. The Cal women had four swimmers make ‘A’ finals we didn’t predict, including freshmen Teagan O’Dell (400 IM) and Annie Jia (100 fly), who placed 3rd and 5th, respectively. Sophomore Mary-Ambre Moluh claimed 6th in the 100 free after not being picked in the top eight, while fellow French Golden Bear Lilou Ressencourt took 8th in the 200 fly. The two swimmers who landed multiple top-eight finishes after being predicted for none were a pair of seniors, UCLA’s Rosie Murphy and Pitt’s Claire Jansen. Murphy, fresh off setting best times and earning top-three finishes across the board at the Big Ten Championships, set a big PB of 4:02.22 in the prelims of the 400 IM to make the final, ultimately placing 7th in 4:03.55. She also cracked the 200 IM final, going on to finish 8th, while during the Saturday prelim session she took on a daunting double, hitting a new PB in the 200 back shortly after the 200 IM to finish 12th and score in all three of her events. Jansen, who, like Murphy, set new best times in all three of her individual events at her conference championship meet, made the 100 back final, finishing 7th after we didn’t pick her in the top eight. On the last day of the meet, she followed up by sneaking into the 200 back final in 8th (1:50.31), and then dropped a new best time of 1:49.10 in the final to take 4th. In terms of winners, we went 15/18 (improving on 13/18 last year), with the misses coming in the 500 free, 200 IM and 200 fly. Cal freshman Claire Weinstein claimed the 500 free title over defending champion Jillian Cox, two nights after Cox ran down Weinstein in the 1650 free. Stanford senior Lucy Bell won the 200 IM, while our pre-race pick Anastasia Gorbenko was 4th, and the Cal duo of O’Dell and Mia West finished 2nd and 3rd. And as previously mentioned, Texas’ Stoll snapped the 200 fly title away from Indiana freshman Alex Shackell on the last 50, while our winner pick, Michigan junior Hannah Bellard, was 3rd. There were five swimmers we picked to finish in the top eight who didn’t end up scoring at all. Leah Shackley and Brady Kendall in the 100 fly, Jillian Crooks in the 100 back, and both Eneli Jefimova and Mackenzie Lung in the 200 breast. Jefimova was just one session removed from winning the 100 breast title when she had an off swim in the 200 breast heats, while Lung was the 2025 runner-up in the event. Another notable miss was Miranda Grana, who we picked to finish 4th in the 100 back, and although she still scored, she ended up back in 14th.

    See how our final selections in the team standings turned out here.

    Read the full story on SwimSwam: Reviewing SwimSwam’s 2026 NCAA Event Predictions – Women’s Edition

    Hence then, the article about reviewing swimswam s 2026 ncaa event predictions women s edition was published today ( ) and is available on swimswam ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.

    Read More Details
    Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Reviewing SwimSwam’s 2026 NCAA Event Predictions – Women’s Edition )

    Apple Storegoogle play

    Last updated :

    Also on site :

    Most viewed in Sport