The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) announced India’s men’s cricket team squad for the upcoming England ODI series on June 21. Prior to the reveal, reports had already suggested that Hardik Pandya won’t be included. The all-rounder was initially expected to play in the India vs Afghanistan ODI series but wasn’t fit to return.
Hardik was dealing with a back injury during the Indian Premier League (IPL) 2026 season and had been undergoing rehabilitation at the BCCI’s Centre of Excellence (CoE) in Bengaluru from June 2. Initially, back spasms were the concern. At Hardik’s request, a performance block programme was prepared.
All was going well. However, just before the India vs Afghanistan ODI series could commence, Hardik sustained a quadriceps injury. The all-rounder was advised to rest for 4 to 5 days and to follow a 3-week training programme afterwards to come back to full fitness.
Prior to the BCCI naming the squad, Hardik had started light training on June 16. That would mean the fast-bowling all-rounder would most likely regain fitness by early July and be fit for selection for the India vs England ODI series, which commences on July 14. Yet, Hardik hasn’t been picked.
“Hardik experienced a minor/low grade tenderness in his leg on June 9. He voluntarily got the leg scanned as a precautionary measure. The scans were sent to Dr Dinshaw Pardiwala in Mumbai, who advised him a 4-5 day rest followed by a three-week training programme to come back to full fitness. He started light training on June 16,” a source told Cricbuzz.
Hardik Pandya missed 4 matches for the Mumbai Indians in IPL 2026 and hasn’t played an ODI since March 2025 | Image Credit: AP Photo/Fatima Shbair via AlamyWhy Kohli was picked and Pandya wasn’t
For the Afghanistan series, there was an asterisk next to Rohit Sharma’s name. He too was recovering from an injury. But he recovered in time and played in all 3 matches. For the England series, there is an asterisk next to Virat Kohli‘s name, who’s struggling with a hamstring injury sustained during the IPL 2026 season. If Kohli can be included as ‘subject to fitness’, why not Hardik?
The answer isn’t simple. Hardik has a long history of injuries and delayed returns. The Afghanistan series is another example. He was playing last week, but as things stand, his comeback has been pushed back 4 weeks. It’s learnt that Hardik underwent a fitness test at the CoE for the India vs England ODI series but failed to bowl his quota of 10 overs.
Now, Hardik isn’t expected to bowl 10 overs per match. He delivers 39 balls or 6.3 overs per game in ODI cricket. But he needs to be prepared to deliver his entire quota, that too under pressure. There’s no use rushing him. In India’s ICC trophy runs in the past 3 years, Hardik has played a seminal role. One can argue that, without him, India may not have won even 1 title.
The BCCI won’t risk Hardik for the ODI World Cup 2027. India needs him and Jasprit Bumrah, the two biggest weapons in white-ball cricket, to be fit for that tournament. Missing the India vs England ODI series doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things.
Why BCCI picked ‘injured’ Virat Kohli for India vs England ODIs but not Hardik Pandya Inside Sport India.
Hence then, the article about why bcci picked injured virat kohli for india vs england odis but not hardik pandya was published today ( ) and is available on Inside sport ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Why BCCI picked ‘injured’ Virat Kohli for India vs England ODIs but not Hardik Pandya )
Also on site :
- Japanese men accused of double standards over viral World Cup clean-ups: ‘Please do it at home’
- World Cup 2026 LIVE: Mohamed Salah creates history for Egypt and Iran send new message after visa row
- Wyndham Clark surprised by father after tumultuous US Open win that wasn’t one-man job: ‘What a warrior’