We’ve simulated the NCAA men’s basketball tournament thousands of times to find the chances of teams advancing in March Madness. The probabilities surrounding Michigan vs. Arizona and Illinois vs. UConn help preview the Final Four.
The final weekend of March Madness does not always live up to the buildup, but this year feels different.
Not because of chaos, but because of how the Final Four has come together.
Illinois has surged through the bracket as a No. 3 seed, playing some of the most complete basketball in the tournament. UConn arrives after delivering one of the most memorable moments of March Madness, knocking out Duke, the slight pre-tournament favorite, on a last-second shot that instantly changed the shape of the field.
On the other side, Michigan and Arizona are two powerhouses that have done exactly what elite teams are supposed to do in the tourney: handle their business without drama.
What remains is a Final Four built in two different ways: momentum on one side and stability on the other.
Final Four Schedule
Times ET; Games on TBS, truTV and HBO Max
Saturday – Semifinals
No. 3 Illinois (28-8) vs. No. 2 UConn (33-5), 6:09 p.m. No. 1 Michigan (35-3) vs. No. 1 Arizona (36-2), 8:49 p.m.Monday – Championship
Semifinal winners, 8:50 p.m.For March Madness predictions, we’ve simulated the tournament thousands of times using TRACR (Team Rating Adjusted for Conference and Roster), a net efficiency metric that calculates a team’s points per possession on both sides of the ball, adjusted for the strength of the opponent.
There’s no clear favorite. No single path that is more obvious or feels more likely than the rest.
We have two semifinal games that feel completely open.
Here is what will decide who advances to Monday night’s championship game.
Overall championship probabilities as of April 1.Final Four
No. 3 Illinois (28-8) vs. No. 2 UConn (33-5)
Tipoff – 6:09 p.m. ET Saturday (TBS, truTV, HBO Max)
Win Probability – Illinois: 63.3%; UConn: 36.7%
TRACR Ranking – Illinois: 41.9 (third in NCAA Division I); UConn: 33.7 (ninth)
Offensive TRACR – Illinois: 28.2 (first); UConn: 17.5 (26th)
Defensive TRACR – Illinois: -13.7 (16th); UConn: -16.2 (12th)
NCAA Tournament Wins – Illinois (South Regional): Penn, 105-70 (first round); VCU, 76-55 (second round); Houston, 65-55 (Sweet 16), Iowa, 71-59 (Elite Eight). UConn (East Regional): Furman, 82-71 (first round); UCLA, 73-57 (second round); Michigan State, 67-63 (Sweet 16); Duke, 73-72 (Elite Eight).
Coaches – Illinois: Brad Underwood (ninth season); UConn: Dan Hurley (sixth season)
3 Key Players – Illinois: Keaton Wagler, 6-6 guard (17.9 ppg, 5.0 rpg, 4.3 apg); Andrej Stojakovic, 6-7 guard (13.6 ppg, 4.4 rpg, 1.0 apg); David Mirkovic, 6-9 forward (13.5 ppg, 8.1 rpg, 2.6 apg). UConn: Tarris Reed Jr., 6-11 center (14.7 ppg, 8.8 rpg, 2.1 bpg); Alex Karaban, 6-8 forward (13.2 ppg, 5.2 rpg, 2.3 apg); Solo Ball, 6-4 guard (12.9 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 1.5 apg).
What to Know – Illinois, representing the Big Ten, enters as the highest-rated offense in Division I, per TRACR at 28.2, and has backed up that number in the NCAA Tournament with at least 65 points and at least a double-digit victory in every game. UConn, from the Big East, arrives after one of the most, if not the most defining moment of the tournament, beating Duke out on freshman guard Braylon Mullins’ 35-foot 3-pointer with 0.4 seconds left. In fact, the Huskies’ last two wins are by a combined five points, showing an ability to execute late in tight games. While Illinois holds the edge offensively, UConn’s defense ranks slightly higher overall, anchored by Reed and his all-around style. Wagler has been the engine for Illinois, leading the team in scoring and ranking second nationally in offensive DRIP, with Stojakovic and Mirkovic giving the Illini multiple scoring options. UConn’s frontcourt size and rim protection could be key factors against an Illini squad that thrives on efficient shot making. The contrast in this matchup is quite clear: Illinois brings the most explosive offense remaining, while UConn has leaned on physical defense and late-game composure. With Illinois favored by our model and UConn battle-tested in close games, this sets up for an epic clash between scoring pressure and execution under pressure.
No. 1 Michigan (35-3) vs. No. 1 Arizona (36-2)
Tipoff – 8:49 p.m. ET Saturday (TBS, truTV, HBO Max)
Win Probability – Michigan: 54.6%; Arizona: 45.4%
TRACR Ranking – Michigan: 46.5 (first in NCAA Division I); Arizona: 43.7 (second)
Offensive TRACR – Michigan: 25.3 (third); Arizona: 23.0 (sixth)
Defensive TRACR – Michigan: -21.2 (first); Arizona: -20.7 (second)
NCAA Tournament Wins – Michigan (Midwest Regional): Howard, 101-80 (first round); Saint Louis, 95-72 (second round); Alabama, 90-77 (Sweet 16), Tennessee, 95-62 (Elite Eight). Arizona (West Regional): Long Island, 92-58 (first round); Utah State, 78-66 (second round); Arkansas, 109-88 (Sweet 16); Purdue, 79-64 (Elite Eight).
Coaches – Michigan: Dusty May (second season); Arizona: Tommy Lloyd (fifth season)
3 Key Players – Michigan: Yaxel Lendeborg, 6-9 forward (15.2 ppg, 7.0 rpg, 1.3 bpg); Morez Johnson Jr., 6-9 forward (13.2 ppg, 7.3 rpg, 62.5 FG%); Elliot Cadeau, 6-1 guard (10.2 ppg, 5.8 apg, 37.7 3-point%). Arizona: Brayden Burries, 6-4 guard (16.1 ppg, 1.5 spg, 40.2 3-point%); Jaden Bradley, 6-3 guard (13.3 ppg, 4.4 apg, 39.4 3-point%); Motiejus Krivas, 7-2 center (10.4 ppg, 8.2 rpg, 1.9 bpg).
What to Know – Michigan, the Big Ten regular-season champ, and Arizona, which swept the Big 12 regular-season and tournament titles, enter the Final Four ranked first and second, respectively, in overall TRACR as well as defensive TRACR. The defensive side of the advanced stats leaderboards are full of Michigan and Arizona players. Michigan’s Lendeborg and Aday Mara are the top two in defensive VAPR, while Johnson ranks sixth; Lendeborg and May both rank in the top seven in defensive DRIP as well. Arizona has four players ranked in the top 25 in defensive VAPR, led by Krivas, who’s third there plus sixth in defensive DRIP. Lendeborg is currently tied with Cameron Boozer for first in all of college basketball in WAR. Neither team has won by fewer than 12 points throughout the NCAA Tournament. Arizona has made the Final Four for the first time since 2001 (the Wildcats lost to Duke in the championship game) and then lost in the Elite Eight five straight times before this year’s win over Purdue. Michigan is returning to the Final Four for the first time since 2018, when they lost to Villanova in the title game.
Potential Championship Matchups (Win Probability)
Whoever wins the Michigan vs. Arizona semifinal will go into the championship game as the favorite, as they’ve both dominated this season. But UConn and Illinois have experience with knocking off high-level opponents this March, as UConn upset Duke, currently third in TRACR, and Illinois beat Houston, currently seventh in TRACR.
UConn has had the hardest path to the Final Four when it comes to their opponents’ combined TRACR. Illinois lost to both UConn and Michigan in their matchups this season while Arizona beat UConn on Nov. 19. Michigan and UConn did not play each other this season, and Arizona did not play Michigan or Illinois.
Michigan (59.9%) vs. Illinois (40.1%)
Michigan (72.9%) vs. UConn (27.1%)
Arizona (54.0%) vs. Illinois (46.0%)
Arizona (67.9%) vs. UConn (32.1%)
For more coverage, follow on social media at Instagram, Bluesky, Facebook and X.
Final Four Predictions: Michigan vs. Arizona, Illinois vs. UConn, and What Will Get It Done Opta Analyst.
Hence then, the article about final four predictions michigan vs arizona illinois vs uconn and what will get it done was published today ( ) and is available on The Analyst ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Final Four Predictions: Michigan vs. Arizona, Illinois vs. UConn, and What Will Get It Done )
Also on site :
- PIN Stockholder Alert: Shareholder Rights Law Firm Robbins LLP Reminds Investors of the Class Action Lawsuit Against Pinterest, Inc.
- Spain’s FA condemns Islamophobic chants during game with Egypt
- Teenagers wreak havoc in Clapham during Easter holiday ‘link up’