Recently, the Times of San Diego published an opinion piece titled “As a Father, Jew and Councilmember, I’m Appalled by Brutality in Gaza” by Sean Elo-Rivera. While I respect the sincerity behind that essay and the concern it reflects for the lives of all children, it represents a troubling trend in our public discourse: invoking Jewish identity as a moral credential to justify arguments built on ahistorical comparisons and dangerous false moral equivalence.
Jewish values do indeed reject indiscriminate violence, dehumanization, and cruelty. But applying those values to the current war in Gaza requires moral clarity — starting with an honest account of who is responsible for this war and the suffering it causes. That responsibility lies squarely with Hamas:
Any moral analysis must start with this reality.
The above are all indisputable facts. Including that over the past four months, Israel has repeatedly accepted ceasefire proposals mediated by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar; while Hamas has rejected every one of them because each required it to relinquish power in Gaza and release the hostages.
Hamas has never offered to release all the hostages together — or even close to all. Its strategy is to string out the releases to maintain leverage, while Gaza’s civilians, the hostages, and their families continue to pay the price.
That is why simply saying, we cannot fight “brutality with brutality” or “atrocities with atrocities” is not an answer. It does not explain how to free all the hostages or how to end the massacres and mass-kidnappings Hamas has promised to repeat — again and again — until Israel is destroyed.
All wars, even the most “just” wars, from the American Civil War to World War II, are brutal and involve atrocities meeting other atrocities. War itself is an atrocity. But the moral question is never whether war is a brutal atrocity — it is whether the alternative is worse.
In World War II, by the final year of the conflict, German civilians were facing far worse food shortages than Gazans face today (because of Hamas stealing and hoarding food). During WWII, the U.S. and Britain carried out bombing campaigns that tragically killed more than 80,000 German children.
Had Allied leaders listened to calls like those in Elo-Rivera’s article, the Nazis would have remained in power — free to subjugate Germans and continue slaughtering Jews and others across Europe. The same moral muddle today would leave Hamas in power to mortgage the future of Gaza’s children on the altar of violent jihad and condemn more Israeli babies and children to the promised endless rounds of violence, which Hamas and its supporters openly celebrate.
Moral equivalence obscures this reality. To suggest that Israel’s democratically elected government and Hamas — a Islamist Supremacist terrorist dictatorship that revels in civilian casualties on both sides — share equal blame is not an act of Jewish conscience. It is a distortion that undermines the very values it claims to uphold.
Jewish history, with its long memory of persecution, demands recognition of the necessity of self-defense. It teaches that liberty cannot coexist with tyranny, and that protecting innocent life sometimes requires dismantling the forces that would destroy it. Judaism is not a pacifist faith — it understands the concept of a “just war.” This is why, despite the excruciating costs, most Israelis — across political lines — agree that Hamas’s military and political control over Gaza must end.
Holding Israel to account for its conduct in war is not antisemitic, and it is consistent with Jewish values. But equating Israel’s war to defend itself after October 7th with the deliberate actions of a terrorist organization committed to its destruction is neither just nor moral. Jewish ethics demand precision, not platitudes — and moral courage will always require more than the comfort of slogans.
In this moment, clarity is not optional. It is the very thing Jewish values demand.
Mitch Danzig is a San Diego attorney and past president of Stand With Us in San Diego.
Hence then, the article about opinion jewish values demand moral clarity not equivalence in gaza was published today ( ) and is available on Times of San Diego ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Opinion: Jewish values demand moral clarity — not equivalence — in Gaza )
Also on site :
- One of the 'Best Country Love Song Duets' Gets Reimagined as 'Incredibly Sad' Version by Kelly Clarkson
- Cómo la táctica de Israel de eliminar a los líderes iraníes podría complicar la búsqueda de Trump de una solución definitiva
- Ukraine-Russia war latest: Putin’s aide says no part of Russia is safe after Kyiv hits base 800km from border