There’s a controversy brewing over “AI-generated” studies submitted to this year’s ICLR, a long-running academic conference focused on AI. At least three AI labs — Sakana, Intology, and Autoscience — claim to have used AI to generate studies that were accepted to ICLR workshops. At conferences like ICLR, workshop organizers typically review studies for publication […]
© 2024 TechCrunch. All rights reserved. For personal use only.
Hence then, the article about academics accuse ai startups of co opting peer review for publicity was published today ( ) and is available on tech crunch ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Academics accuse AI startups of co-opting peer review for publicity )
Also on site :
- I went to Cambridge from state school and was patronised and laughed at
- What To Watch Sunday: The Night Manager And Industry Return, Fear Factor Reboot, Golden Globes, And More
- Pricer launches commercially ready Pricer Avenue™ at NRF, redefining the shelf edge for high-value retail zones