said it. Nevertheless, it highlights an important fact—people are easily outraged by smaller stories that are easy to grasp, but tend to shrug at bigger faceless problems. It offers a lesson for government officials, who routinely spend huge sums—but get clobbered for wasteful small ones.
tabled the proposal and is likely to scale it back.
pension—but the idea speaks volumes about the agency’s judgment.
Related Articles
Editorials | Shift ballot powers from AG to LAO Editorials | Wildfires spur smarter approaches to rebuilding Editorials | Investigate and shutter the bullet train Editorials | Early signs that Trump has overplayed his hand Editorials | DeMaio’s insurance bill is the wrong solution OCWD manages groundwater supplies for the county. The agency, according to the article, doesn’t even respond directly to fires or work directly with first responders. Everyone appreciates the work firefighters do in responding to emergencies and protecting public resources, but, per Sforza again, that’s just a firefighters’ job. It’s a well-paid one at that.point: “I’ll be the first to say I support first responders 100%. … I feel this expense is not appropriate. We can find other ways to do this.”
remodeling their offices. Optics matter and this party had poor ones. The board should scrap the entire idea and post a thank-you note on its website.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Water district’s scuttled $10,000 party spotlights waste )
Also on site :
- NYT ‘Connections’ Hints and Answers Today, Tuesday, June 17
- Barbra Streisand Reveals Jaw-Dropping Details of Scandalous Proposal from Hollywood Icon!
- Today’s NYT ‘Strands’ Hints, Spangram and Answers for Tuesday, June 17