Boris must resign v destruction of democracy: Opinion divided after Supreme Court rules BoJo’s suspension of parliament ‘unlawful’ ...News

Russia Today - News
Boris must resign v destruction of democracy: Opinion divided after Supreme Court rules BoJo’s suspension of parliament ‘unlawful’
The UK Supreme Court ruling that Boris Johnson acted “unlawfully’ when he suspended parliament has divided analysts over whether the British PM should quit and whether the judgement amounts to “constitutional vandalism.” All 11 judges in London were unanimous in ruling on Tuesday that Johnson’s advice to the Queen to prorogue (suspend) parliament was “unlawful, void and of no effect.” John Wight, a political analyst and journalist, told RT that Johnson’s position as PM is “surely untenable,” because it had been proven that he misled the monarch. He suggests this is just “a nice way of saying you lied” to the Queen.

Hence then, the article about boris must resign v destruction of democracy opinion divided after supreme court rules bojo s suspension of parliament unlawful was published today ( ) and is available on Russia Today ( News ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Boris must resign v destruction of democracy: Opinion divided after Supreme Court rules BoJo’s suspension of parliament ‘unlawful’ )

Apple Storegoogle play

Last updated :

Also on site :