The Supreme Court’s selective history ...Middle East

The Hill - News
The Supreme Court’s selective history
The Supreme Court’s six-member conservative majority has increasingly adhered to a jurisprudence that seeks to enforce the Constitution’s “original meaning,” which was “fixed” at the time of ratification. In case after case, the majority has discovered arrays of mostly obscure historical sources revealing that the original meaning of the Constitution just happens to coincide with the objectives of the Republican Party. It is poor judging and worse history. In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, for example, Justice Samuel Alito looked to what he called our nation’s “history and tradition” to declare that the Constitution “does not confer a right to abortion.” Neither the Four

Hence then, the article about the supreme court s selective history was published today ( ) and is available on The Hill ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( The Supreme Court’s selective history )

Apple Storegoogle play

Last updated :

Also on site :