California’s grand geographical divide – the distance from the Pacific Ocean – shows up in numerous economic statistics.
Consider one yardstick of homeownership longevity: the time since sellers purchased their residence, as measured in the third quarter. The Attom study examined 114 metropolitan areas, including 27 in California.
In the 13 metros near the coast or San Francisco Bay, the median length of ownership was 11.8 years, compared with 10.5 years in the 14 inland metros.
It’s not a new trend. Looking back a decade, the gap was 9.5 years coastal vs. 8.7 inland.
But this longevity spread is widening. The length of ownership has grown by 2.3 years on the coast since 2015, but by just 1.8 years inland.
Affordability likely drives the divide. First, the historically cheap mortgages of the pandemic era make relocation financially challenging now that rates are near historic norms. And for those lucky enough to have huge gains from their homes, tax challenges arise when considering relocation.
Plus, the coastal markets have pricier housing, so moves to or within these areas can be prohibitively expensive. Meanwhile, the more affordable inland metros have been where Californians have been moving to, especially into newly constructed homes, moderating longevity.
What’s clear is that Californians, no matter where they live, own their homes longer than the national norms – and that duration is expanding faster.
The median ownership of the 87 metros outside the Golden State was 8.7 years in the third quarter. Non-California longevity was up just 1.1 years from 7.6 years in 2015.
Here’s how sellers in the state’s 10 most-populous metros compare on ownership, ranked by longest stays …
San Francisco: 13.1 years, No. 2 of the 114 U.S. metros – up 3.4 years.
Ventura County: 12.6 years, No. 9 nationally – up 2.6 years.
San Jose: 12.5 years, No. 10 nationally – up 2.8 years.
Sacramento: 11.2 years, No. 27 nationally – up 2.4 years.
Los Angeles-Orange County: 11 years, No. 31 nationally – up 1.9 years.
San Diego: 11 years, No. 32 nationally – up 1.9 years.
Stockton: 10.9 years, No. 33 nationally – up 3.1 years.
Fresno: 10.7 years, No. 35 nationally – up 1.4 years.
Bakersfield: 10.2 years, No. 39 nationally – up 2.3 years.
Inland Empire: 10.2 years, No. 40 nationally – up 1.8 years.
Jonathan Lansner is the business columnist for the Southern California News Group. He can be reached at jlansner@scng.com
Related Articles
Californians have 4th-lowest credit card burden in US Where are California rentals vacant the longest? Fishing and real estate have similarities, not just ‘the one that got away’ Former Calabasas estate of actor John Stamos seeks $7.3 million HOA Homefront: 4 new laws from Sacramento in 2025Related Articles
Chapman economist sees ‘no gangbuster year’ in 2026 After California lawsuits, Trump administration pauses plan to divert billions of dollars from homeless housing Residents of Woodland Hills fight a plan to build 398 homes in a canyon with wildfire risks LA County rent relief for those impacted by wildfires, immigration crackdown Roommates can save California tenants 38% on rentHence then, the article about where do california homeowners stay the longest was published today ( ) and is available on Los Angeles Daily News ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Where do California homeowners stay the longest? )
Also on site :
- Anycubic Opens Deposits for Kobra X, Following Formnext Debut of Its Next-Generation Entry-Level Multicolor FDM Printer
- Disgraced former Centinela Valley schools Superintendent Jose Fernandez dies
- As millions of Gen Zers face unemployment, CEOs of Amazon, Walmart, and McDonald’s say opportunity is still there—if you have the right mindset