By James Sutherland on SwimSwam
It’s that time of the year again. SwimSwam will be previewing the top 12 men’s and women’s teams (and then some) from the 2025 NCAA Championships. Follow along with the College Swimming Preview Channel. Want to read even more? Check out the latest edition of the SwimSwam magazine.
#7 LOUISVILLE CARDINALS
Key Losses: Gabi Albiero (30 NCAA points, 3 NCAA relays), Tristen Ulett (1 NCAA point), Lucy Mehraban (1 NCAA point, 1 NCAA relay), Fernanda Celidonio (1 NCAA relay)
Key Additions: #11 Julie Mishler (IN – sprint free), Anastasia Gorbenko (Israel – all-arounder), Xeniya Ignatova (Kazakhstan – backstroke), Anna Inagaki (Japan – breaststroke), Maya Bezanson (Canada – free/IM)
GRADING CRITERIA
Over the years, we’ve gone back and forth on how to project points, ranging from largely subjective rankings to more data-based grading criteria based on ‘projected returning points.’ We like being as objective as possible, but we’re going to stick with the approach we’ve adopted post-Covid. The “stars” will rely heavily on what swimmers actually did last year, but we’ll also give credit to returning swimmers or freshmen who have posted times that would have scored last year.
Since we only profile the top 12 teams in this format, our grades are designed with that range in mind. In the grand scheme of college swimming and compared to all other college programs, top 12 NCAA programs would pretty much all grade well across the board. But in the interest of making these previews informative, our grading scale is tough – designed to show the tiers between the good stroke groups, the great ones, and the 2015 Texas fly group types.
5 star (★★★★★) – a rare, elite NCAA group projected to score 25+ points per event 4 star (★★★★) – a very, very good NCAA group projected to score 15-24 points per event 3 star (★★★) – a good NCAA group projected to score 5-14 points per event 2 star (★★) – a solid NCAA group projected to score 1-4 points per event 1 star (★) – an NCAA group that is projected to score no points per event, though that doesn’t mean it’s without potential scorers – they’ll just need to leapfrog some swimmers ahead of them to do itWe’ll grade each event discipline: sprint free (which we define to include all the relay-distance freestyle events, so 50, 100 and 200), distance free, IM, breaststroke, backstroke, butterfly and diving. Use these grades as a jumping-off point for discussion, rather than a reason to be angry.
Also, keep in mind that we are publishing many of these previews before teams have posted finalized rosters. We’re making our assessments based on the best information we have available at the time of publication, but we reserve the right to make changes after publication based on any new information that may emerge regarding rosters. If that does happen, we’ll make certain to note the change.
2024-2025 LOOKBACK
The Louisville women essentially mirrored their 2023-24 performance last season, scoring just two and a half fewer points at the NCAA Championships despite losing two of their top three scorers from 2024, Christiana Regenauer and Else Praasterink.
Filling in those losses was Julia Dennis, who followed up a 14-point sophomore campaign with 27 as a junior, and Ella Welch, who put up 12 points in her junior year after scoring zero as a sophomore.
The ever-reliable Gabi Albiero wrapped up her career with the Cardinals with her fourth-straight 30+ point outing, scoring 30 with ‘A’ final appearances in the 100 fly (5th) and 50 free (7th) and a consolation final showing in the 100 free (13th), and the relays delivered as has become the norm.
Louisville scored 130 relay points, finishing in the top three in three of the five team events, highlighted by a runner-up finish in the 200 free relay.
However, despite nearly matching their 2024 point total, the Cardinals slid one spot in the standings at the 2025 NCAAs, placing 7th after being overtaken by Indiana.
At the ACC Championships, Louisville placed 3rd after its runner-up finish in 2024, with Virginia continuing its dominance atop the conference while newcomers Stanford and Cal sandwiched the Cardinals in 2nd and 4th.
SPRINT FREE: ★★★★
Despite losing a key player in Gabi Albiero, Louisville’s sprint free group is in good shape heading into next season, led by Julia Dennis, who took a big step last season to become one of the fastest 50 swimmers in the nation.
Dennis set a best time of 21.08 in the 50 free en route to placing 2nd to Gretchen Walsh at the 2025 ACC Championships, and then took 3rd at NCAAs in 21.20 behind Walsh and Claire Curzan.
In addition to that, Dennis produced sub-21 relay splits at both meets, with her fastest coming on the anchor leg of the 200 medley relay at NCAAs in a blistering 20.49.
With Walsh graduating, Dennis immediately becomes a co-favorite for the national title next season, with Curzan her biggest threat.
The Cardinals have another returning scorer in the 50 free, rising junior Caroline Larsen, who tied for 14th last season and had a season-best of 21.63, while rising senior Ella Welch was within a tenth of scoring after placing 22nd at NCAAs in 21.98.
Bolstering the sprint group is incoming recruit Julie Mishler, the fastest 50 freestyler in the girls’ high school class of 2025 with her best time of 21.56, which would have placed her 5th in last year’s NCAA ‘A’ final.
In the 100 free, Dennis was an ‘A’ finalist last season, placing 8th after setting a PB of 47.11 in the prelims, while Larsen (48.02), Welch (48.44) and Daria Golovaty (48.55) all raced at NCAAs and give the team a solid core given they’re losing half of their 400 free relay from NCAAs (Albiero and Lucy Mehraban). Larsen was 19th at NCAAs, 14 one-hundredths back of scoring position (three tied for 16th at 47.88). They’ve also got Avery Karl and Karoline Barrett, who were both 49.3 last year, for additional depth.
Among the recruits, Mishler owns an elite best time of 47.58, which puts her right on the cusp of making the NCAA ‘A’ final (it took 47.37 to place 8th in the prelims last year).
Anastasia Gorbenko is talented in every stroke, and likely won’t be swimming much freestyle individually, but has been 52.36 in short course meters and 54.29 in long course, making her a potential relay player.
Louisville is also sneaky good in the 200 free with Amelia Bodenstab (1:43.67) and Golovaty (1:43.98) having scored at NCAAs last season, placing 13th and 15th, respectively, as freshmen. Bodenstab came into the season with a PB of 1:45.96, and steadily improved up until her 1:43.6 swim in the NCAA prelims to earn a second swim, while Golovaty seamlessly transitioned to yards coming over from Israel, breaking 1:44 in November (1:43.99) and then doing it again at ACCs.
Summer Cardwell set three consecutive best times in the 200 free in February, clocking 1:44.68 in the prelims and then 1:44.59 in the final at ACCs to place 8th, and then she fired off a new PB of 1:44.22 at the UofL Last Chance Meet to secure an individual berth at NCAAs. The rising junior ultimately finished 37th at NCAAs (1:45.71), but her lifetime best would’ve been within four one-hundredths of scoring, so she’s in the hunt for a second swim this season. She also had the fastest split on Louisville’s 800 free relay at NCAAs (1:43.79).
The Cards will lose their fourth sub-1:45 200 freestyler from last year, Fernanda Celidonio, and they also see some of their depth walk out the door with Paige Hetrick (1:45.12), Mehraban (1:45.51), Tristen Ulett (1:46.11) and Camden Doane (1:47.60) no longer on the roster.
For the 800 free relay, they could have Gorbenko (1:56.74 LCM), Xeniya Ignatova (1:58.78 SCM) or Maya Bezanson (1:58.58 SCM/2:01.59 LCM) step in as the fourth swimmer.
Along with Mishler, Kaitlyn Sallows (50.8/1:50.0) and Lily Willis (1:49.1) highlight the domestic recruits in sprint free.
DISTANCE FREE: ★★
Louisville didn’t score any distance freestyle points at NCAAs last season, and despite not bringing in any swimmers who will make an immediate impact, there is optimism that they can hit the board in 2026.
Golovaty hit her stride early last season, setting a personal best time of 4:38.79 in the 500 free during an October dual meet against Tennessee, a time just three one-hundredths off what it ended up taking to score at NCAAs. She got back under 4:40 twice more during the season, including 4:39.25 to win the ‘B’ final at ACCs, but placed 44th at NCAAs in 4:43.73.
Bodenstab dropped four seconds over the course of the season in the 500 free, getting down to 4:40.55 at NCAAs to finish 31st. Cardwell set a PB of 4:41.48 at the end of January against Indiana, going on to place 46th at NCAAs (4:44.20), while Brazilian Leticia Fassina Romao set a best of 4:43.10 at ACCs in her freshman year before taking 52nd at NCAAs (4:45.11).
That gives them four chances for someone to break through and score in the 500, with Golovaty already fast enough to do so, while in the 1650, Fassina Romao is right there. She placed 4th at ACCs in a best time of 15:58.57, within a second of the 16th-place time at NCAAs (15:57.60), where she ended up 22nd (16:07.15). Given that half of last year’s scorers have graduated, Fassina Romao should be in the top 16 this season. She’s coming off winning a pair of gold medals at Junior Pan Ams in the 800 and 1500 free in the long course pool, and also gained some experience at the World Championships, placing 20th in the 1500.
BACKSTROKE: ★★½
The Cardinals only had one NCAA entry in a backstroke event last season, and with Rye Ulett (33rd in the 200 back) graduating, they have none coming back, though Camille Murray looks like she’s ready to earn an individual spot this year after performing well as a relay-only swimmer as a freshman.
Murray took down her two-year-old best time in the 100 back leading off Louisville’s 400 medley relay at NCAAs, clocking 51.65, her fastest swim of the season by a half-second and under what earned an individual invite to NCAAs (51.68).
Murray wasn’t even on the Louisville roster at the ACC Championships, where their top finisher in the 100 back was 32nd (Abby Karl, 53.62), but if she can keep her late-season momentum rolling into her sophomore year, she’ll likely be a fixutre on the Cardinals’ NCAA team for the next three seasons. In terms of scoring in the 100 back, she still has some time to drop, with 51.20 being the cut-off last year.
Karl is the team’s next-fastest returner in the 100 back, having been a PB of 52.82 at the Ohio State Invite in November, while Kim Herkle is next up at 53.54.
In the 200 back, Murray (1:55.85) and Herkle (1:56.62) were the team’s two fastest performers last season who are coming back, with Murray owning a personal best of 1:54.80 from March of 2023.
Although the scoring prospects are thin among Louisville’s returning backstrokers, there is some optimism when looking at the incoming recruits.
Julie Mishler is best known for her sprint free prowess, but she’s also extremely talented in the 100 back, owning a personal best time of 51.87. She was 9th in the 100 back at the recent World Junior Championships in long course (1:00.65), and will certainly be tackling the event as her third race to go along with the 50 and 100 free. If she continues to improve, Mishler is a scoring threat in the 100 back.
She could also end up being Louisville’s lead-off swimmer for the 200 medley relay, having placed 11th at U.S. Nationals in the 50 back (28.13) and owning a SCY best time of 24.40.
Mishler is also a quick 200 backstroker, having set a best time of 1:53.26 this past March, but the event doesn’t fit into her schedule with the 100 free being more of a focus.
Kazakhstan native Xeniya Ignatova competed at the World Championships this year and should give a nice boost to the Cardinals’ backstroke group with 59.01/2:06.45 best times in short course meters, converting to 53.16/1:53.91 in yards. Particularly in the 200 back, she’ll be a threat to make the ‘A’ final at the ACC Championships and push for a top-16 NCAA finish.
Gorbenko also has an elite backstroke, making the Olympic final back in Tokyo in the 100 back and then qualifying for the 200 back semis last summer in Paris. Her best times stand at 59.25/2:08.54 in long course and 57.45/2:04.40 in short course, which convert to times of 51.75 in the 100 back and 1:52.07 in the 200 back.
Looking at a potential schedule for Gorbenko, the 200 IM looks like a lock, and then on Day 3, the 100 back could be there, but the 400 IM or 100 breast seems more likely. However, on Day 4, the 200 back fits into her lineup perfectly—she’s raced it far more frequently than the 100 free, 200 breast and 200 fly—so there’s potential points there for the Cards, with her converted time just three-tenths off the 2025 scoring cut-off of 1:51.75.
Sadie Murphy joins the team with best times of 55.4/1:58.0 in the backstrokes, making her a potential contributor down the road if she continues to develop. Maya Bezanson figures to focus more on free and IM, but owns a best time of 2:09.61 in the SCM 200 back.
BREASTSTROKE: ★★★
Louisville’s top breaststroker last season was Mia Cheatwood, who transferred over from West Virginia in the summer of 2024 and had a solid junior campaign at Louisville, narrowly missing out on NCAA scoring.
Cheatwood set a new personal best of 58.77 in the 100 breast and 2:07.74 in the 200 breast in a November dual with Notre Dame, securing her NCAA qualification early in the season.
She went on to place 6th at ACCs (59.68) and 21st at NCAAs (59.14) in the 100, though her PB would’ve comfortably made the ‘B’ final. In the 200, she tied for 18th at NCAAs with teammate Kim Herkle in 2:08.73, 17 one-hundredths outside of scoring position (2:08.56), while her personal best ended up being just 13 one-hundredths back of what it took to make the ‘A’ final (2:07.60). Herkle set a PB of 2:07.98 at ACCs, giving them another potential scorer
Caroline Larsen was the team’s other sub-1:00 100 breaststroker last season, clocking a personal best of 59.63 to top the ACC consolation final before taking 42nd at NCAAs in 1:00.29. Ella Welch (1:00.06) and Herkle (1:00.93) were the other two returners on the roster sub-1:01.
Louisville will also be welcoming Japanese breaststroker Anna Inagaki to the fold. She owns personal best times of 31.57, 1:08.37 and 2:27.99 in the long course breaststroke events, which give her 59.79 and 2:09.72 conversions in the 100 and 200 in short course yards. It’s worth noting that her best times in the 50 and 200 are from 2024, and the 100 is from 2023. She has raced sparsely in 2025, with her fastest 100 time coming in at 1:11.92, so what type of form she shows up in Louisville remains a bit of a question mark. At her best, though, she has a chance to be an NCAA qualifier as a freshman.
And then, of course, there’s Anastasia Gorbenko, who has a short course world title to her name in the 50 breast. The 22-year-old owns a LCM best time of 1:06.15 in the 100 breast, converting to 57.79, while in the 200 breast, her SCM time of 2:19.22 translates to 2:05.42. Based on the fact she didn’t race the 400 IM at all in 2025, it seems likely the 100 breast is on her postseason schedule, and she should be in the ‘A’ final and one of the top contenders for the title.
Louisville’s three-star rating hinges on Gorbenko earning a top finish in the 100 breast, Cheatwood breaking through and scoring it both events, and either Herkle or Inagaki cracking the top 16 in one of their events. If everything goes right, they could push into four-star territory, or if things don’t pan out, they could fall to two stars.
BUTTERFLY: ★★★
Louisville only has one scoring butterfly swimmer returning this season in Ella Welch, who broke 52 seconds for the first time in the 100 fly early last season (51.89 in late October) and then built her way to three 50-point swims in the postseason.
Welch set a personal best time of 50.74 in the 2025 ACC final to place 5th, and then clocked 50.72 in the NCAA prelims to advance 4th into the ‘A’ final. She finished 7th at night in 50.93, with teammate Gabi Albiero 5th in 50.69. Including Albiero, four of the six women who finished ahead of Welch last season have graduated, with only Torri Huske and Miranda Grana returning. Given that, Welch is in position for a top-five finish this year, also acknowledging that NC State freshmen Leah Shackley and Erika Pelaez went 50-point in last year’s NCAA ‘B’ final and incoming recruit Alex Shackell has been sub-50.
Beyond Welch, Louisville’s top returners in the 100 fly are Karoline Barrett (52.26) and Caroline Larsen (52.80), while newcomers Julie Mishler (54.38) and Anastasia Gorbenko (58.23 LCM) also have respectable times in the event, though none are expected to be scoring threats/race the 100 fly in the postseason.
The Cardinals had Tristen Ulett make the ‘B’ final last season in the 200 fly, but with her graduating, Summer Cardwell is their top swimmer coming back, having held a season-best of 1:57.56 before placing 41st at NCAAs (1:57.61).
There’s more depth with incoming recruits Kaitlyn Sallows (54.1/1:58.2) and Sophia Rodriguez (53.8) coming in with some fly pedigree.
Despite the butterfly group looking thin from a scoring perspective, Welch earning an ‘A’ final berth in the 100 fly still makes this a three-star group.
IM: ★★★
The addition of Anastasia Gorbenko gives Louisville’s medley group a massive shot in the arm. The four-time European champion in the 200 IM (three LC, one SC) and 2024 champion in the 400 IM, Gorbenko should probably be favored to be the NCAA runner-up in the 200 IM at the moment, with defending champion Torri Huske holding firm as the pre-season frontrunner.
Gorbenko owns best times of 2:08.55 in long course and 2:05.04 in short course, giving her a 1:52.64 conversion, but assuming she transitions smoothly into the yards pool, she should be more in the 1:50-1:51 range.
Gorbenko got down to 4:34.87 in the long course 400 IM in 2024, winning silver at the World Championships in Doha before winning gold at the Euros in Belgrade (4:36.05), but didn’t race it in 2025, indicating we’ll see her more focused on the 200 IM and likely the back and breast events with Louisville.
At NCAAs last season, Louisville had four entries in the 200 IM, but the only returner is Kim Herkle, who clocked 1:57.26 to place 39th. Herkle was also their lone 400 IM entrant, placing 34th in 4:12.03 after hitting a season-best of 4:09.26 at ACCs. At the 2024 NCAAs, she placed 18th in what remains her lifetime best of 4:08.94.
So with Herkle being a possibility, but on paper, not likely to score, Gorbenko is the team’s only lock.
Maya Bezanson comes in with solid best times in SCM (2:12.37/4:40.27), giving her 1:59.25/4:12.49 conversions. She may end up racing the 200 free on Day 3, but we’ve seen Canadians have plenty of success (including four finalists last season) in the 400 IM at NCAAs, so we shouldn’t sleep on her scoring prospects.
Summer Cardwell was 4:12.49 last season in the 400 IM, but raced the 200 free over it at NCAAs, while incoming recruits Lily Willis (1:59.9) and Kaitlyn Sallows (2:00.8/4:16.8) add some depth to the IM group.
DIVING: ★
Louisville’s lone returning NCAA qualifying diver is Sammantha Helmboldt, who heads into her junior year coming off a 23rd-place finish in platform and 41st-place showing on 1-meter at the 2025 NCAAs. Helmboldt was about 18 points back of cracking the top 16 at NCAAs on platform, so she’s still on the outside looking in when it comes to points.
The other returning diver on the roster is Audree Brazeau-Howes, whose best performances at ACCs were a pair of 25th-place finishes in the 3-meter and platform events.
Dutch National Team diver Maud Van Kempen competed at the European Championships this past spring and will give the team a boost in diving points at ACCs, as should Samantha Keith, who joins the team coming off an 11th-place finish on platform at the USA Junior Diving Nationals.
RELAYS: ★★★★
Note that the grading system doesn’t align perfectly for relays as double points.
Relay grading system:
5 star (★★★★★) – 31+ points per relay event 4 star (★★★★) – 22-30 relay points per event 3 star (★★★) – 12-21 relay points per event 2 star (★★) – 5-11 relay points per event 1 star (★) – 0-4 relay points per eventLouisville’s relays pulled in a whopping 130 points last season at NCAAs, 62% of their total. Although the team is losing a key piece of last year’s success in Gabi Albiero, they should be in good shape with a strong returning core intact plus some key incoming recruits.
They were the runner-ups in the 200 free relay last season with Albiero, Caroline Larsen, Julia Dennis and Ella Welch. They’ll return three of the four, and can seamlessly slot in Julie Mishler, who can cover Albiero’s split from last year of 21.38. Given that the only team that beat them, Virginia, is losing half of its squad (most notably the fastest woman ever, Gretchen Walsh), and was only six-tenths up on them last season, the Cardinals have a realistic chance at the national title, with a lot of that hinging on Dennis being able to replicate something close to her sizzling 20.63 split.
The team also pulled off a clutch 3rd-place finish in the 400 free relay last year, which leapfrogged them past Cal into 7th place overall in the final event of the meet. Half of that relay is no longer on the team with Albiero graduating and Lucy Mehraban transferring to Texas, but Dennis had their fastest split by a wide margin (46.52) and Larsen was 47.43 as a freshman and should be able to build on that. Mishler and her 47.58 PB will cover the third leg, and the fourth spot will likely go to either Daria Golovaty, who was 48.55 from a flat start and 48.18 with a takeover at last November’s Ohio State Invite, or Gorbenko, who owns elite 100 free best times of (54.29 LCM/52.36 SCM) and should be reliable to throw down something quick.
The 800 free was the team’s lone relay that didn’t finish in the top eight at the 2025 NCAAs, taking 12th in 6:56.86. The only swimmer they’re losing is Fernanda Celidonio, who had their slowest split at NCAAs (1:44.48), with Golovaty, Cardwell and Bodenstab all coming back. Golovaty and Bodenstab didn’t have their fastest swim of the season come on the relay, so there could be a bit of time to drop there. As for the replacement on the fourth leg, it very well may be Gorbenko, who has been 1:56.74 in the LCM 200 free, while other freshmen Maya Bezanson and Xeniya Ignatova have both been 1:58 in SCM. It still seems unlikely they’ll average anything faster than sub-1:44s (6:56), which probably keeps them out of the top 10 but still well within the points.
The 200 medley relay team grabbed 3rd last season behind a strong performance from Abby Karl, Larsen, Albiero and Dennis. They were 7th at the final exchange, but Dennis’ sizzling 20.49 anchor leg moved them up four spots. In losing Albiero, the Cardinals will likely slot in Welch on fly, where she should be able to split something in the 22.5-9 range (swimming the fly leg of the 400 medley relay, her first 50 was 23.17).
They could also reshuffle things on backstroke. Karl was 24.05 on the lead-off leg at both the Ohio State Invite and NCAAs last season, but Mishler could be a threat to take that spot (24.40 best time) and Murray was 24.37 to the feet opening her 100 back last year on the 400 medley relay at NCAAs.
Larsen split 26.28 on breast last year, which is elite, but they could drop another half-second if they slot in Gorbenko. Whichever lineup they end up going with, the team should be able to produce something similar to their 3rd-place finish from last year, though a lot of that hinges on a similarly blistering anchor leg from Dennis.
The 400 medley relay is the lone race where Louisville returns all four members from the 2025 NCAAs: Murray (51.65), Cheatwood (59.29), Welch (50.43) and Dennis (46.39). That quartet earned them 8th place, but they had the slowest breaststroke leg among the top eight by over a second. If they move Gorbenko onto the breast leg, they could realistically chop at least two seconds off their time, which theoretically moves them into the top four.
Total Stars: 22.5/40
2025-26 OUTLOOK
Louisville is turning the page from the successful Gabi Albiero era. In five seasons, she scored 146 individual NCAA points, with 141 of those coming in the last four years (35.25 average). Despite that massive loss, as she was not only a reliable individual scorer but a leader on the team’s relays, the Cardinals appear to be well-positioned entering 2025-26.
This year’s core will center around rising seniors Julia Dennis, Ella Welch and Mia Cheatwood, rising sophomores Caroline Larsen, Amelia Bodenstab and Camille Murray, and the strong recruiting class headlined by Anastasia Gorbenko and Julie Mishler.
Despite the recent departures of Christiana Regenauer and Albiero, the team’s strength still revolves around the 50 and 100-yard events, keeping Louisville in the upper echelon of relay teams in the NCAA. After relays accounted for 62% of their points in 2025, they’ll be relying on them heavily to buoy them again, and with Dennis, Welch, Larsen, Mishler and Gorbenko leading the way, they’re well equipped to do just that.
Individually, Dennis (27) and Welch (12) are the only two returning swimmers who hit double-digit points last season, but that number should grow with Gorbenko and Mishler entering the fold.
In the NCAA team standings, Louisville could move up from its 7th-place finish last season, given that 6th-place Florida lost four of their top five scorers. However, Cal, Michigan and NC State, 8th, 9th and 10th last season, all improved, so one of them could conceivably leapfrog the Cardinals.
WOMEN’S 2025-26 COLLEGE PREVIEW INDEX
RANK (2024) TEAM SPRINT FREE DISTANCE FREE BACK BREAST FLY IM DIVING RELAY TOTAL 1 Virginia Cavaliers 2 Stanford Cardinal 3 Texas Longhorns 4 Indiana Hoosiers 5 Tennessee Volunteers 6 Florida Gators 7 Louisville Cardinals ★★★★ ★★ ★★½ ★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★ ★★★★ 22.5/40 8 Cal Golden Bears ★★★½ ★★★★ ★★★½ ★★★ ★★★★ ★★½ ★ ★★★★ 25.5/40 9 Michigan Wolverines ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★★ ★★½ ★ ★★★★★ 26.5/40 10 NC State Wolfpack ★★★ ★ ★★★★★ ★★★★ ★★★ ★★ ★ ★★★★ 23/40 11 USC Trojans ★★★★ ★★★ ★ ★½ ★ ★★★½ ★★ ★★★ 19/40 12 Wisconsin Badgers ★★ ★ ★★½ ★★ ★ ★ ★ ★★ 12.5/40Read the full story on SwimSwam: 2026 College Swimming Previews: #7 Louisville Women Well Equipped For Post-Gabi Albiero Era
Hence then, the article about 2026 college swimming previews 7 louisville women well equipped for post gabi albiero era was published today ( ) and is available on swimswam ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( 2026 College Swimming Previews: 7 Louisville Women Well Equipped For Post-Gabi Albiero Era )
Also on site :