In a recent op-ed, Thomas Hochman and Lars Erik Schönander of the Foundation for American Innovation championed the expansion of categorical exclusions (CEs) under the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). While their arguments for streamlining infrastructure deployment, particularly for geothermal energy, are well-intentioned, they miss a fundamental point: NEPA exists to ensure that we, as a nation, make informed decisions that prioritize the health and sustainability of our environment. The Council for Environmental Quality (CEQ), responsible for guiding the implementation of NEPA, recently issued new proposed rules for NEPA review, including actions qualifying for a categor
Hence then, the article about no congress should not expand the use of categorical exclusions was published today ( ) and is available onThe Hill ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( No, Congress should not expand the use of categorical exclusions )