A report by CricBlogger has claimed that India head coach Gautam Gambhir's approval was sought before the BCCI finalized an extension for chief selector Ajit Agarkar.
It is suggested that the decision was delayed for some time as the board waited for Gambhir's view before taking a final call.
The report further stated that Gautam Gambhir has emerged as one of the most influential figures in Indian cricket, with significant input on team-related matters.
According to the report, Agarkar's extension as chairman of selectors was not finalized immediately because the BCCI wanted clarity on Gautam Gambhir's position before moving forward.
The report quoted a source as saying that the India head coach has "a big say on most matters" concerning the national team setup. It is suggested that Gambhir's views carry considerable weight in discussions involving team planning and squad management.
It also claimed that he has the ability to strongly advocate for certain players and influence conversations around selection. Importantly, these claims were attributed to unnamed sources, and there has been no official confirmation regarding the reported decision-making process behind Ajit Agarkar's extension.
"Such a level of influence is virtually unheard of in Indian cricket. According to sources, Gambhir enjoys enormous authority over team affairs. He can back players for selection, push for omissions, and wield significant influence over the composition of the squad," the report read.
Why Gautam Gambhir's opinion could matter in selection discussions
Even without accepting the report's claims as fact, it is easy to understand why a head coach's opinion would be considered important in modern international cricket.
The coach is responsible for implementing long-term plans, developing playing combinations, managing player workloads, and preparing teams for major tournaments.
As a result, alignment between the coaching staff and selection committee has become increasingly important across cricketing nations. A selector may identify the best available talent pool, but the coach ultimately works with those players on a daily basis.
Therefore, discussions between coaches and selectors are now a normal part of team-building at the highest level. If a chief selector and head coach share a common vision, continuity becomes easier to maintain across formats and tournament cycles.
That is why consultation between the two positions is generally viewed as beneficial rather than unusual. However, consultation is different from control, and the exact extent of any coach's influence often remains behind closed doors.
Interestingly, the same report claimed that Gambhir's influence is not absolute. According to CricBlogger, Gambhir was not in favor of Shreyas Iyer becoming India's T20I captain and would have preferred either Sanju Samson or Ishan Kishan for the role.
The report alleged that the BCCI made it clear that appointing the captain was the selectors' responsibility rather than the coach's. As a result, Shreyas Iyer was reportedly appointed despite not being Gautam Gambhir's preferred choice.
It was claimed that selectors wanted Shreyas Iyer in India's T20 World Cup squad, whereas Gautam Gambhir had backed Washington Sundar for selection.
How India's previous head coaches worked with selectors
The relationship between India's head coach and the selection committee has evolved significantly over the years. During Ravi Shastri's tenure, his close working relationship with then-captain Virat Kohli often attracted public attention.
While Shastri was widely regarded as an influential voice within the setup, selectors continued to retain formal authority over squad selection. Public discussions frequently centred on the Kohli-Shastri leadership combination, but major decisions were still officially routed through the selection committee.
Under Rahul Dravid, the structure appeared more collaborative and less public. Dravid rarely commented on selection matters beyond explaining team requirements and combinations. His tenure was generally characterized by a quieter working relationship between the coaching staff and selectors.
Going further back, coaches traditionally had even less visible influence on selection matters. The Indian system historically placed considerable authority in the hands of selectors, while coaches focused primarily on preparation and performance.
That said, international cricket has changed dramatically. Multi-format scheduling, workload management, data analysis, and long-term planning have increased the importance of coaching staff in strategic decision-making.
As a result, modern coaches often play a larger consultative role than their predecessors. The key difference is that such influence is rarely discussed publicly, making reports like this particularly noteworthy. Meanwhile, Ravichandran Ashwin recently slammed Gautam Gambhir after Sanju Samson snub.
Hence then, the article about gautam gambhir becomes indian cricket s most influential figure approved ajit agarkar s extension report was published today ( ) and is available on cricketaddictor ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Gautam Gambhir becomes Indian cricket's most influential figure, approved Ajit Agarkar's extension: Report )
Also on site :
- Another French museum robbed despite ‘special attention’ after Louvre heist
- Ronaldo’s last World Cup? We will see, says Portugal star before Spain clash
- The supertanker tycoon making millions on Hormuz ‘shuttle runs’