The Ukraine conflict hasn’t changed the world, just exposed what was already breaking
Four years ago, Russia’s decision to launch a military operation in Ukraine stunned almost everyone, including supporters and critics alike. Few believed Moscow would take such a drastic step. For decades, the prevailing assumption in global politics had been that force was no longer a legitimate way to resolve disputes. When military action did occur, it was wrapped in euphemisms such as humanitarian intervention and the defense of human rights.
In practice, this meant that military power was considered acceptable only when used to reinforce the existing international order, the liberal world order, and therefore only by its architects, above all the United States.
Russia broke that rule.
The operation in Ukraine was the culmination of contradictions that emerged after the Cold War. Moscow had long opposed NATO’s eastward expansion and the systematic dismissal of its security concerns. These objections were formally laid out in the Russian Foreign Ministry’s memorandum of December 2021, which called for a revision of the principles underpinning European security since 1990.
This was also an implicit admission of failure. Russia had been unable, through diplomacy alone, to secure respect for its interests. The previous model of relations with the West had reached its end. Any new model would require a fundamental reordering of the international system, just as East-West relations once shaped the entire global structure during the Cold War.
Ukraine, for reasons both historical and geopolitical, found itself at the center of this collision.
Four years on, Russia’s immediate objectives have not been fully achieved. The operation has lasted far longer than anyone anticipated. Yet the world itself has undeniably changed. The Ukraine conflict did not cause these changes, but it accelerated processes already underway.
Read more How Russia broke Ukraine’s defensive strategy in year fourRussia’s actions demonstrated something many suspected but few dared to test: Western power has limits. Despite dire warnings from Washington, most countries outside the US alliance system refused to join punitive measures against Moscow. They chose their own interests instead. This came as a shock to the Biden administration, which attempted to revive a Cold War framework of “free world versus tyranny.”
That effort failed. The problem was not rhetoric, but reality. Many states important to the US neither met the criteria of the so-called “free world” nor showed any enthusiasm for pretending they did. As Western pressure failed to halt Russia’s campaign, perceptions of a broader crisis in global authority only deepened.
By 2023-24, Moscow had reinforced an alternative vision of international cooperation, notably through BRICS and similar groupings. These were not ideological alliances, but pragmatic ones. Serving as signs of a world increasingly organized around choice rather than loyalty.
The real turning point came with the change of administration in Washington. The liberal world order was no longer treated as a sacred structure to be preserved, but as an obstacle to American national interests. US dominance remained the goal, but it was redefined in bluntly transactional terms: securing material advantages and extracting value wherever possible.
Where the Biden administration sought to maintain the old system, albeit unsuccessfully, the Trump administration speaks openly about restoring Western power without the institutions or courtesies that once accompanied it. At the Munich Security Conference this year, Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared that Americans are “not interested in polite managed decline of the West.”
The message was clear. The US has entered a struggle for a new division of the world, and intends to act while its accumulated advantages still give it leverage.
Whether Trump will succeed remains uncertain. He faces resistance at home and abroad. But one thing is already evident: the old order is gone, and no one is seriously planning its restoration. The rules of restraint have been loosened. “Take what you can” has become the unspoken guide to action.
Read more Back to the 19th century: Why is Russia targeting Ukraine’s energy grid?Others are taking note. China, having forced Washington to retreat on tariffs, has reassessed its own strength. Israel is reshaping the Middle East to suit its long-term objectives. Regional powers everywhere are reassessing whether they now have the capacity to resolve longstanding disputes by force.
Competition over critical minerals, markets, and technologies is intensifying. Revolutionary changes – in bioengineering, materials science, artificial intelligence, demography, labor markets, and environmental management – are reshaping the foundations of power. In some cases, technology drives geopolitics; in others, it magnifies existing rivalries. Either way, the global environment is one of constant turbulence and this is the world four years after the Ukraine operation began.
So, what has Russia learned? When the decision was taken in 2022, Russia’s leadership believed that security threats would soon become intolerable if left unanswered. Subsequent events largely confirmed that assessment. Western governments, particularly in Europe, showed how quickly they were prepared to sever ties. Even if it came at great cost to themselves. Old fears and resentments resurfaced with remarkable speed.
It also became clear that Ukraine had been preparing for military confrontation, and that diplomatic processes were, at best, a facade. The question of whether a “Chinese-style” strategy, delaying confrontation while advancing interests, might have been possible is ultimately speculative. It offers no practical guidance today. What matters is how Russia now positions itself.
Four years ago, the conflict was widely portrayed as decisive for the future of global order. Even Moscow, though it avoided saying so openly, understood the stakes in similar terms. The West framed the confrontation as a battle between civilization and barbarism, but that framing has now evaporated.
Under Trump, Ukraine has been downgraded in American thinking. It’s going from a civilizational struggle to just another conflict to be “managed,” even theatrically resolved. It has become, in Washington’s eyes, a European regional issue rather than a universal cause. This aligns the US position with that of much of the Global South, which has always viewed the conflict as an intra-Western dispute with unresolved historical roots.
The US still sets the global tempo. And that tempo is accelerating. Not only in dismantling the old system, but in the scramble to secure positions in the new one. Across Russia’s entire perimeter, the strategic landscape is shifting.
Read more Are we all going to die in a nuclear war?Russia’s immediate priority remains clear: to conclude this phase of the conflict on acceptable terms. The outcome matters most domestically. The Ukraine operation has tested the resilience of the state and society alike, and it has triggered transformations whose end point is still uncertain.
What it has not delivered is a qualitative expansion of Russia’s global position. That might have been possible had initial objectives been achieved quickly. Instead, while Western efforts to isolate and crush Russia failed, they did succeed in narrowing Moscow’s focus. Other global processes moved forward without Russian participation.
This has had consequences. Russia’s presence in global markets has contracted. Its influence in neighboring regions has weakened. Shifts in Syria, Venezuela, the South Caucasus, and even energy assets in Europe reflect this broader pattern. Each case has its own explanation, but together they form a coherent picture. It would be dishonest to pretend otherwise.
Since the early 2000s, Russia assembled its global role through a combination of inherited influence and economic integration. With, occasionally, some opportunistic diplomacy. Over time, this created the impression of a durable global footprint. Indeed, so much so that, when relations soured, critics spoke of Russian “tentacles” everywhere.
In reality, many of these positions depended on favorable circumstances rather than structural strength. Once Moscow became fixated on Ukraine, those vulnerabilities were exposed.
The end of active hostilities will not bring stability. The world has entered a prolonged phase of competitive redistribution. No decisive victory is likely. Instead, there will be repeated shocks and tests of endurance. In this marathon, Russia has advantages. Its resources, and experience in operating under pressure make it unusually resilient. As states everywhere seek greater autonomy, Russia’s relative self-sufficiency becomes an asset.
Crucially, Moscow has few binding alliances to lose. Even Belarus seeks diversification. This flexibility allows Russia to engage pragmatically with countries looking to expand their options, especially as American pressure generates behind-the-scenes resentment among its partners.
The task ahead is internal coherence: aligning military experience, economic adaptation, political nous, and state capacity into a unified strategy. The decisive factor will not be ideology, but the quality of governance and the ability to respond intelligently to emerging challenges.
The old rules are gone. Everyone is now mixing their own drinks and the hunting season is open.
This article was first published by the magazine Profile and was translated and edited by the RT team.
Hence then, the article about fyodor lukyanov ukraine marked this major shift in global politics was published today ( ) and is available on Russia Today ( News ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Fyodor Lukyanov: Ukraine marked this major shift in global politics )
Also on site :
- Homemade dumplings are a Lunar New Year staple. Last week, a cafe invited those who’d never made them to give it a try.
- Trump strips endangered species protections for lesser prairie chicken, the dancing, booming grouse of the Southwest
- Man arrested in Telford on suspicion of possession of gun after Ketley incident