Savers who remain loyal to big banks are missing out on hundreds of pounds a year, with the gap widening sharply as balances rise and tax starts to bite.
The biggest banks now pay an average of just 1.19 per cent on easy-access accounts, compared with 4.12 per cent from leading challenger banks.
With a savings pot of £10,000, that is the difference between earning £119 and £412 over a year – a £293 shortfall for those sticking with a typical high-street provider, analysis from Moneyfactscompare.co.uk shows.
But the penalty for inertia becomes even more stark for households holding larger cash buffers.
With £15,000, a saver would earn £178.50 at 1.19 per cent, compared with £618 at 4.12 per cent, a £440 gap.
At £20,000, the difference rises to £586.
By £25,000, it reaches £733, and at £30,000 the annual gap stands at £879.
Caitlyn Eastell, personal finance analyst at Moneyfactscompare.co.uk, said: “With savings rates expected to drop further from the peaks seen over the past few years, staying in a low-paying account may amplify the cost, making it harder for savers to reach their financial goals.
“Switching to a lesser-known challenger bank could help offset this, as they often offer more attractive rates.”
Savers don’t have to take on additional risk by switching as many challenger banks are covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS), which protects deposits up to £120,000.
However, Eastell warned savers need to watch out for bonus rates that are pulled after a set period of time.
She said: “Challenger banks often lead the market with headline rates that include limited-time bonuses, sometimes exceeding two per cent.
“Once bonuses expire, rates can fall sharply, so passive savers risk being left behind and those seeking stability may find these less suitable for long-term planning.”
Big banks include Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, NatWest and Santander whilst challengers include a variety such as Chase, Kent Reliance and Shawbrook Bank.
When tax starts to erode returns
Savers also need to be aware of how much they could be taxed on their savings.
The personal savings allowance – £12,570 – means basic-rate taxpayers can earn £1,000 in interest tax-free each year, while higher-rate taxpayers can earn £500.
At 4.12 per cent – the average challenger bank interest – a £15,000 balance generates £618 in returns.
This means a higher-rate taxpayer would pay tax on £118 of that, resulting in a £47.20 bill, Quilter found.
At £20,000, interest of £824 leads to £129.60 in tax for a higher-rate payer. By £30,000, the tax bill rises to £294.40.
Basic-rate taxpayers are less exposed at these levels, paying nothing on £15,000 or £20,000 at 4.12 per cent, but at £25,000 they would face a small £6 bill, rising to £47.20 at £30,000.
By contrast, the lower 1.19 per cent big bank rate does not come close to breaching the allowance at these balances.
The trade-off is obvious, Gregor Davidson, senior external communications manager at Quilter, said.
Higher rates mean higher gross returns, but for larger pots they can also trigger a tax charge that eats into the benefit.
He explained: “The data is pretty clear – it pays to be active with your money.
“Big banks are reliant on the fact you use them as a one-stop shop for all your banking and financial needs, and as such they can use their scale to offer lower rates.
“Challenger brands have been around for a while now, with some backed by some of the world’s largest organisations, so it makes sense to shop around and ensure your money is sweating as hard as it can for you.”
Experts suggest putting as much as you can into a tax-free wrapper such as an ISA, especially if you are a higher-rate taxpayer.
Last year, the Government said the cash ISA limit will drop to £12,000 for under-65s from April 2027, with the remaining £8,000 still available for a stocks and shares ISA.
Many investment platforms now also have cash platforms where you can manage your more immediate savings needs alongside your longer-term ones.
Davidson said: “If you generally only use cash for your savings then it will make much more sense for the remainder of the ISA limit to go into an investment account.
“Any money that you do not need for at least five years needs to be put to work in investments.
“The data shows that over five years, especially in higher-return potential investments, can make a significant difference to your overall wealth compared to the average cash ISA rate.”
Cash ISA versus investing over one year
For savers worried about tax, a one-year fixed cash ISA paying an average of 3.76 per cent would generate £376 on £10,000, £564 on £15,000 and £752 on £20,000, all tax-free.
That compares with £500, £750 and £1,000 respectively if those sums achieved a 5 per cent investment return over the same period. At an 8 per cent return, the figures rise to £800, £1,200 and £1,600.
Your next read
square PROPERTY AND MORTGAGESWe bought a £900,000 houseboat as a London bolt hole – it’s already lost £100,000
square PROPERTY AND MORTGAGES Money ClinicShould I overpay my mortgage while the interest rate is still below 2%
square PENSIONS AND RETIREMENT Pension DiariesMy husband and I are pensioners on £1,700 a month – but we feel incredibly rich
square MONEYI’m a PhD student and will have £20,000 of student-loan debt – interest is a tax
Over longer periods, compounding magnifies the difference with a five-year fixed ISA offering 3.82 per cent turning £10,000 into £12,062 – a gain of £2,062.
At a 5 per cent annual return, the same sum would grow to £12,763 – a £701 difference. At 8 per cent, it would reach £14,693, £2,631 more than the cash ISA outcome.
On £20,000, the five-year ISA gain is £4,123, compared with £5,526 at 5 per cent and £9,387 at 8 per cent.
However, investing always carries risk and savers should seek professional advice to find out the best options for them.
Hence then, the article about savers missing out on up to 879 a year by sticking with big banks was published today ( ) and is available on inews ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Savers missing out on up to £879 a year by sticking with big banks )
Also on site :
- Europe’s cyber agency blames hacking gangs for massive data breach and leak
- AI companies are building huge natural gas plants to power data centers. What could go wrong?
- The Trump Dictatorship Is Cracking Up