Are early detection and treatment always best? ...Middle East

Health.harvard.edu - News
Are early detection and treatment always best?
Throughout my medical career, I’ve heard statements like these: Early detection offers the best chance of cure. If you wait for symptoms, you’ve waited too long. Knowledge is power, and the sooner you have the information, the better. Over time, I’ve realized they are often untrue. Many health conditions go away on their own. In such cases, early testing may amount to wasted effort, time, and medical cost. Some testing is invasive and has a significant risk of complications. And minor abnormalities may lead to more testing. There’s also the anxiety of waiting for results, or learning you have an abnormality of uncertain importance that requires additional evaluation. Why wait? Why not just t

Hence then, the article about are early detection and treatment always best was published today ( ) and is available on Health.harvard.edu ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Are early detection and treatment always best? )

Apple Storegoogle play

Last updated :

Also on site :

Most viewed in News