The recent decision by House Speaker Mike Johnson to conclude House proceedings early for the summer recess has sparked significant debate regarding transparency in government, particularly concerning the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Johnson’s choice to sidestep a looming vote on the release of Epstein files reflects not only his intention to provide the White House with "space" but also an effort to navigate intra-party tensions. The absence of action on this pressing issue suggests a reluctance within Republican leadership to confront demands from both sides of the aisle for greater accountability .
Mounting pressure over President Donald Trump’s alleged ties to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has reportedly rattled and divided Republican congress members so deeply that the House speaker called an early recess on Tuesday.
Democrats had pushed for a vote to release files related to Epstein as Trump fends off questions over his relationship with the financier, who died by suicide in his jail cell in 2019. Now the House will break up on Wednesday instead of Thursday in what Democrats say is a way to dodge the vote.
Mr. Johnson’s move will, for now, deny Democrats the chance to force procedural votes that would call on the Justice Department to make the information public. It reflected how deep divisions among Republicans on the matter have paralyzed the House, where G.O.P. lawmakers are trying to avoid another politically perilous vote on an issue that is confounding President Trump and roiling the MAGA base.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Tuesday that he will take the highly unusual move of meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell — who was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison for carrying out a yearslong scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls — to ask what she knows but hasn’t so far told. Epstein died in jail while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges.
“I don’t know anything about it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office Tuesday.
This seems a stretch, since Blanche is Trump’s former personal lawyer and plans to speak with a prisoner who has a clear incentive to offer testimony that could help a president who has the power to let her out of prison.
The decision has drawn criticism from both sides of the aisle, as bipartisan calls for greater transparency regarding Epstein-related documents continue to mount. Notably, former President Donald Trump’s previous promises to release additional information remain unfulfilled. Critics argue that Johnson's actions signify an unwillingness to confront uncomfortable truths within his party and reflect deeper intra-party turmoil that threatens his leadership position .
Read more
Japan Stocks Tread Water as Election Outcome Sparks Fiscal, Trade Worries Prince William and Harry Mourn Cousin Aged 20 Found Dead Near Firearm
Sara H
Also on site :
- Kevin Costner facing $400,000 lawsuit after Horizon 2 delay
- ‘This is devastating’: New Jersey dietician buys Siete gluten-free tortillas. Then she takes a taste—and says Pepsi is to blame
- Chicago woman throws large McDonald’s cup of water on woman and her dog. Now people are applauding her: ‘What I wouldn’t give to see footage of this’