The recent ruling by a federal judge to halt broad immigration stops and arrests in Southern California marks a significant victory for civil rights advocates. This decision, prompted by a lawsuit from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Southern California, underscores the ongoing concerns regarding racial profiling and constitutional violations perpetrated by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. The judge's order specifically prohibits the detention of individuals based on race, language, or occupation, emphasizing that such practices contravene the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures .
The first TRO bars immigration agents from stopping individuals without reasonable suspicion and from relying on four factors – alone or in combination – including apparent race or ethnicity; speaking Spanish or English with an accent; presence in a particular location like a bus stop, car wash, or agricultural site; or the work the person does. The second TRO orders DHS to provide access to counsel on weekdays, weekends, and holidays for people who are detained in B-18, the federal building in downtown Los Angeles.
According to the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA), the decision includes two temporary restraining orders. The first keeps immigration officers from stopping people without reasonable suspicion, or stopping people over their apparent race, whether they speak Spanish, where they work and more.
The second requires the Department of Homeland Security to provide detainees at the federal building in downtown Los Angeles access to legal representation.
During the hearing on Thursday, Sean Skedziewelski, a lawyer for the federal government, defended the tactics that the agents had been using in Los Angeles. He said that when they encountered people whom they weren’t initially targeting, “agents can’t put blinders on.”
Judge Frimpong described the government arguments as “very general,” saying that they “did not really engage with the high volume of evidence that the plaintiffs put in the record of the things we have all seen and heard on the news.”
Last month, the Trump administration called for ICE to expand deportation efforts in Democratic cities and “do all in their power” to achieve mass deportations. Trump also ordered the deployment of thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles last month in response to protests against his administration’s immigration raids. The administration previously sued the city of Los Angeles over its so-called “sanctuary city” policy.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, celebrated Friday’s ruling in a post on X, saying, “California stands with the law and the Constitution — and I call on the Trump Administration to do the same.” Similarly, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass hailed the ruling as “an important step toward restoring safety, security and defending the rights of all Angelenos.”
Moreover, the court's directive extends beyond merely halting indiscriminate arrests; it mandates that ICE provide immediate access to legal representation for detainees. This aspect is crucial in ensuring that individuals are afforded their due process rights during immigration proceedings . The ruling reflects a growing recognition of the need for accountability within law enforcement agencies and affirms that systemic discrimination has no place in American society.
Read more
Air India Crash Linked to Fuel Cutoff and Pilot Error, Preliminary Report Finds Spurs agree £54.5m deal to sign Mohammed Kudus from West HamSara H
Also on site :
- Kevin Costner facing $400,000 lawsuit after Horizon 2 delay
- ‘The entitlement of people with kids baffles me’: Woman settles into her first-class seat on flight. Then a mom approaches her
- ‘You just admitted that you work there’: Vegas woman receives text from stranger. Then she realizes he stole number from her Planet Fitness profile