It’s a basic cornerstone of the American justice system that judges must not participate in cases in which they have a conflict of interest or even the appearance of one.
That’s why state Supreme Court Justice Allison Riggs promptly and publicly recused herself from the court’s consideration of a lawsuit filed by her opponent in last fall’s election — Court of Appeals Judge Jefferson Griffin — challenging the outcome.
Weirdly and disturbingly, however, Griffin has yet to follow suit. Instead, he’s simply issued a vague statement that he quote, “won’t participate” in the case should it come before the court on which he sits. And that’s simply not enough. A plainspoken, public and official recusal is required.
And that’s also the case for two other Court of Appeals judges, Tom Murry and Valerie Zachary, whose campaigns financially supported Griffin’s last fall — actions that, apart from the election case, raise important ethical concerns.
The bottom line: Judge Griffin seeks a seat on the state’s highest court. His actions since last November provide little evidence that he’s ready to fill such a position.
For NC Newsline, I’m Rob Schofield.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Griffin and other conflicted judges must publicly recuse themselves from Supreme Court election case )
Also on site :
- Julia Fox's Net Worth in 2025 Proves She's an It Girl
- Israel strikes Syria again, claims to have killed alleged Hamas member
- Plane crashes at Tennessee Airport: Injuries recorded