The vice presidential debate between JD Vance and Tim Walz provided significant insights into the candidates' positions on key national issues, reflecting a departure from the traditional contentious atmosphere often observed in political debates. Notably, the debate was characterized by a civil tone and substantive policy discussions, which allowed both candidates to articulate their perspectives on pressing matters such as border security and abortion rights . Vance's emphasis on border security contrasted sharply with Walz's focus on reproductive rights, showcasing the divergent priorities of their respective parties.
Vance did what Trump was unable to do by delivering a debate performance that mostly avoided the verbal missteps and the outrageous outbursts that characterized the GOP presidential nominee’s performance in his faceoff with Harris three weeks ago in Philadelphia.
Vance appeared to have an edge over Walz in terms of poise and command of policy.
The debate was almost entirely focused on domestic issues. CBS moderators opened with a question about the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, but did not ask about the United States’ support for Ukraine in its war with Russia.
The unusually normal debate ended with another refreshingly normal moment – the kind that hasn’t been seen over the past decade of presidential debates. The candidates shook hands and chatted away from the microphones, and lingered as their wives joined them.
The debate touched on economic policy, healthcare, and past political statements. Walz admitted to a past misstatement about the Tiananmen Square protests and critiqued Trump's economic record, while Vance defended his past criticism of Trump, claiming the media misled him. They debated the Affordable Care Act, with Vance defending Trump's approach, although his version contradicted historical events
The candidates went out of their way to be polite to each other until the very end, when Vance refused to back down from his statements that he wouldn’t have certified Trump’s 2020 election loss.
Vance tried to turn the issue to claims that the “much bigger threat to democracy” was Democrats trying to censor people on social media. But Walz wouldn’t let go.
Ultimately, while both candidates sought to highlight their qualifications for office through critiques of each other's running mates—Kamala Harris and Donald Trump—their exchanges revealed deeper ideological divides within American politics. Walz's insistence on acknowledging Biden's electoral victory stood in stark contrast to Vance's reluctance to confront Trump's legacy directly. The debate concluded amicably; however, it underscored ongoing tensions in American political discourse regarding leadership accountability and democratic integrity.
Read more
American Pickers presenter Frank Fritz dies aged 60 UK forces respond to Iran's attacks on Israel.Sarah H
Also on site :
- Virginia mom comes in with her 2 kids and orders 3 kids’ meals. Then the server steps in: ‘I’ve been coming here for years’
- Did We Really Say Goodbye to This ‘Stranger Things’ Character For Good?
- How to Watch the Sugar Bowl 2026 Live for Free to See the Georgia vs. Ole Miss Showdown