In food news this week came a report (from the New York Times, no less) that one of its reporters was assigned to follow up on a report (originally published in the Washington Post) of a pending class action lawsuit against the Subway sandwich chain alleging that Subway’s tuna salad sandwiches did not, in fact, have any tuna. So, like any good reporter, the Times’ reporter took the “scientific” approach and had what she described as “more than 60 inches of Subway tuna sandwiches,” from three different Subway locations in Los Angeles, sent to a laboratory for analysis. And, according to the Times, the reports came back that no identifiable tuna DNA could be found in any of the “60 inches” of
Hence then, the article about judicial follies getting the hint was published today ( ) and is available onUkiah Daily Journal ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Judicial Follies: Getting the hint )