Failure to provide Prince Harry and his family with wraparound police protection while in the UK could leave them with substandard protection and exposed to threats, security experts have warned.
Plans for a reunion between the King and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s children are in jeopardy following reports Prince Harry will not be joined by Archie and Lilibet or his wife when he visits London next week.
It is understood that Harry reached the decision after the Government rejected his request for police protection beyond royal residences, with one former Metropolitan Police firearms officer claiming there would be questions to answer over why such a high-profile figure is not being provided with security.
“Protection is a sizable commitment from the taxpayer and it’s right that who benefits from it is considered carefully. But Harry is a high-profile figure and the brother of the future king. If anything were to happen and there was no security provision for it would be damaging for public confidence in policing and to the image of the UK,” a former senior Metropolitan Police firearms officer, who has guarded members of the royal family, told The i Paper.
“People would ask why we don’t protect someone as senior as that. On those grounds alone I would expect security to be provided.”
Harry is set to arrive in the UK next week for events to mark the one-year countdown to the Invictus Games, which will be held in Birmingham.
He had planned to travel with Meghan and their seven-year-old son, Archie, and five-year-old daughter, Lilibet, with the couple understood to have accepted an invitation to stay in a royal residence.
But concerns about the family’s safety when travelling outside of royal grounds in the capital has prompted a change of plans.
Last week it was revealed a report commissioned by the US private security firm that protects Harry found he is the focus of six terrorist plots, five of which originated in the UK.
The document outlines dozens of threats facing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex and includes an al-Qaeda document which called for Harry’s assassination, ITV News reported.
The Sussex family at Christmas (Photo: Meghan, Duchess of Sussex/Instagram)The findings were shared with Ravec, the security committee responsible for deciding if high-profile figures are eligible for taxpayer-funded police protection in the UK.
But the committee, whose membership includes representatives from the royal household, the Home Office, the Metropolitan Police, as well as Sir Clive Alderton, former deputy private secretary to the King, then Prince of Wales, denied Harry’s appeal for such security measures.
It is understood that Harry’s military experience in Afghanistan and any threat posed to him by Islamist groups would have been one of the factors considered by Ravec, which is said to make decisions informed by expert risk assessments and in line with Government policy.
Richard Aitch, a former member of the Royal Military Police’s close protection unit, suggested it is precisely the intelligence-led provision and enhanced security measures that Harry lacks access to which leaves him exposed to potential threats.
He highlighted the Met’s access to intelligence afforded by GCHQ, Mi5 and the Fixated Threat Assessment Centre to inform its response, which could include proactive counter-terrorism arrests.
“Crucial requirements in Met provision also include the ability and capability to have exemption from impeding laws in the delivery of protection. In other words having that capability to dominate the roads, control traffic flow, excess speed if required and likewise, at any venue, to control movement and presence of members of the public, to create that much needed sterile environment,” he added.
Aitch, who has worked in the sector for 30 years and acted as a personal bodyguard for high-profile figures, said if Harry was joined by Meghan and his children and provided with police protection, he would expect a minimum of four security vehicles to accompany them, with the number of personnel dependent somewhat on the activity and location.
A rotating team of officers working shifts throughout a 24-hour period, plus a close protection officer for each of the principals (Harry, Meghan, Archie and Lilibet) would be required, the former Met officer said, adding the cost of a single royal protection officer could be as much as £178,000 per year.
harry and Meghan have not travelled back to the UK as a couple since 2022. (Photo: Jonathan Brady-Pool/Getty Images)Matthew Beer, founder and CEO of King Safety and Security Group (KSS), said: “The involvement of children materially changes the tolerance for residual risk, because children cannot meaningfully consent to that risk and are less able to respond to a fast-moving situation.”
While he stressed private security is not second best and can provide high-quality protection, he added: “The question is whether the reported threat picture requires an armed state capability alongside the private protective measures. Where terrorism is a credible part of the assessment, that becomes a very significant consideration.
“Good protection is preventative: intelligence, advance work, route-planning, venue assessment, low-profile movement and keeping the principal away from avoidable exposure in the first place.”
Lat year Harry lost an appeal over his security provision with a court finding there had been nothing unlawful over how the decision to revoke protection had been reached. His security provision was revoked in 2020 when stepped back from his role as a senior royal in 2020.
Harr and Meghan have not travelled together to the UK since 2022 for the funeral of Queen Elizabeth.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle visit the sitting volleyball section of the fifth edition of the Invictus Games in The Hague on April 17, 2022. (Photo by Sem van der Wal / ANP / AFP via Getty Images)Prior to his retirement in 2022, former head of counter terrorism policing and Ravec member, Neil Basu, confirmed Scotland Yard had investigated numerous credible threats against Meghan’s life.
Harry has also previously been the subject of threats, particularly by National Action, a proscribed neo-Nazi group, because he was viewed as a “race traitor” for marrying Megan. The organisation also threatened others, including MPs and journalists.
However, numerous security experts believe the “fixated threat” from stalkers is more of a risk to Harry’s safety than terrorism.
In January it was revealed the Duke of Sussex’s stalker sat metres from him on two occasions at the High Court when he was present for the start of his privacy trial against ANL, the publishers of the Daily Mail.
Despite the reported threats, the prince lost a legal battle with the Home Office over his UK security arrangements, which were scaled down when he stopped being a working royal in 2020.
A Government spokesperson said: “The UK Government’s protective security system is rigorous and proportionate. It is our long-standing policy not to provide detailed information on those arrangements, as doing so could compromise their integrity and affect individuals’ security.”
The i Paper is part of Harmsworth Media, a publishing division owned by ANL’s parent company DMGT – and has complete editorial independence.
Hence then, the article about the real reason harry and meghan won t bring children to london to meet king was published today ( ) and is available on inews ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( The real reason Harry and Meghan won’t bring children to London to meet King )
Also on site :