Nineteen-year-old Joseph Lee described the profound significance of participating in the legal challenge against his own federal government.
Plaintiffs also seek to reverse the administration’s dismantling of climate science initiatives and monitoring systems.
During cross-examination, Justice Department attorney Erik Van Der Stouwe questioned Lee about whether university air conditioning issues rather than climate change caused his heat stroke hospitalization.
Van Der Stouwe further challenged Lee’s claim that Trump’s climate cuts cost him research opportunities despite university evidence supporting his assertion.
Seventeen-year-old Jorja McCormick described her trauma from wildfire evacuations and rejected suggestions that her family horses contributed significantly to global warming compared to industrial pollution.
Both plaintiffs committed to continuing their climate activism regardless of the court’s final decision in Lighthiser v. Trump.
Lee emphasized that a better future remains possible through persistent advocacy and legal action. – AFP
Hence then, the article about young plaintiffs challenge trump climate agenda in landmark us court case was published today ( ) and is available on Daily Sun ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Young plaintiffs challenge Trump climate agenda in landmark US court case )
Also on site :