Risk to reward fallacy ...Middle East

Let's talk about risk to reward ratio. This is something controversial, because setting a fixed RR (reward to risk) like 3:1 isn't fully wrong, but it isn't even right. You need to understand that there are no certainties that your trade goes to the target, it may reverse at 1:1. You may say "yeah, but I would have already put my SL at BE (breakeven) by that time, because I trailed it" and you would be correct, but what if all of your 3:1 trades end up at breakeven? Your account would be actually down a little because of the commissions you paid. You would have worked hard for nothing. That's why you shouldn't have a fixed rule like that, in trading you need to adapt, be flexible and proacti

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Risk to reward fallacy )

Also on site :

• Help! My Wife and Her Siblings Just Took Ancestry DNA Tests. All Hell’s Broken Loose.
• Paul Simon’s Daughter Condemns Richard Gere for Selling Childhood Home
• Texas mourns flood victims at vigil as search continues for dozens missing