The House of Representatives passed the behemoth $858 billion annual defense bill on Thursday in a 350-80 vote. Among its many provisions is one aimed at improving security for federal judges, which became part of the final bill despite some criticism from judicial watchdog groups.The provision, known as the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act of 2022, would generally forbid the unauthorized disclosure of a judge’s personal information or that of an immediate family member. It would cover home addresses, phone numbers, license plate details, and information about next-of-kin’s workplaces, schools, and daycares, and similar data.The bill is named after the son of Judge Esther Sala
Hence then, the article about the latest ndaa has sparked an unexpected debate over judicial security and the first amendment was published today ( ) and is available onThe New Republic ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( The Latest NDAA Has Sparked an Unexpected Debate Over Judicial Security and the First Amendment )