Back in 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case between the City of Ontario, California, and a police officer it employed that had some interesting implications for workplace privacy and, surprisingly, the Fourth Amendment — the one that deals with search and seizure law. What’s perhaps most interesting about the case, though, is that it revealed how the Court’s justices weren’t (and likely, still aren’t) exactly wizards at modern communication. Jeff Quon was a sergeant with the SWAT unit of Ontario’s police. In 2001, the City bought “alphanumeric pagers” for Quon and the other officers on the department so that they could be on-call 24 hours a day. (For those under, oh, the age of 30,
Hence then, the article about judicial follies making haste slowly was published today ( ) and is available onUkiah Daily Journal ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Judicial Follies: Making haste slowly )