Way Too Early Recruit Rankings: Girls’ High School Class of 2028 ...Middle East

By James Sutherland on SwimSwam

We continue our traditional recruiting coverage with our “Way Too Early” ranks of the upcoming season’s high school junior class. Since top recruits have started giving their verbal commitments earlier and earlier, we’ve moved up our rankings to help give better context to big recruiting announcements.

Before we run over our traditional ranking methodology, we should head off a few counterarguments at the pass:

Isn’t this too early to have a good read on talent? Aren’t 16-year-old kids still improving? Maybe. On the other hand, coaches are clearly finding roster spots for kids who verbally commit this early. And if we and our readership want to have the most accurate picture of how the recruiting season is playing out, it’ll be useful to have some sort of ranking – even one still very much in flux – to refer to as big-name swimmers commit. But recruiting ranks don’t matter. It’s the fast-dropping swimmers and diamonds in the rough that really have the biggest NCAA impact. Not true. There are always fast-rising swimmers who quickly develop into NCAA stars. But there are far less of them than there are elite high school prospects who become high-impact NCAA swimmers. We all love the Cinderella stories, the unranked recruits who flourish into dominators. But even those rags-to-riches stories aren’t as fleshed out if they don’t have a clearly defined setup. These ranks help show us who is most likely to become NCAA standouts… but also contextualize where the eventual breakout stars originally rated compared to peers. If you, your favorite swimmer or your son/daughter isn’t ranked, don’t get mad – see it as the starting point for your/their rise to stardom. How accurate can these be with two-plus years of development to go before any of these swimmers compete in the NCAA? Who knows? Predicting the future never has a 100% hit rate. For these ranks, we’re a little less concerned with actual NCAA scoring times than we are in our junior/senior ranks, and probably marginally more interested in “ceilings” – wide event ranges, versatility, etc. But as with any ranking, these are ultimately nothing more than a snapshot in time: what the top of this recruiting class looks like in the moment, with full admission that a lot of these ranks can and will change by the time they finish their senior years.

THE METHODOLOGY

Our goal in these rankings is to reflect what college coaches look for in recruits, based on many years of conversations and coverage.

We focus only on American-based athletes, simply because there is so much uncertainty with international recruits – if they come to the United States, when they’ll come to the States and with what graduating class they should be ranked. Projecting international recruits often becomes more of a discussion of when they’ll first join a college program and not which program they’ll join.

A few other factors that weigh heavily in our rankings:

Relay Value – Relay points count double in college swimming, and any program needs a strong stable of quality sprinters to fill out all 5 relays with stars. Obviously, a special distance swimmer can easily rank ahead of a very good 100 freestyler, but college swimming generally values a sprint freestyler over a distance swimmer, all other factors being equal. Improvements – Actual times carry the most weight by a long shot. But we also keep an eye on a swimmer’s trajectory, especially in deciding between two swimmers with relatively even times. Short Course over Long Course – while every club and every swimmer will have a different balance of focus between short course and long course swimming, the NCAA competes in short course yards, and that’s going to be the main factor considered in these rankings. Long course times are another data point for consideration, but we mainly view them through the lens of what a big long course swim could mean for an athlete’s future in short course. NCAA scoring ability – NCAAs are the big show for college teams, so we’ve weighted NCAA scoring potential very highly. Swimmers who already have NCAA scoring times wind up mostly filling out the top of our rankings. Since college athletic directors – and by extension coaches – also place high value on conference championships, scoring ability at conference meets is also a factor in our rankings. Relative depth in the NCAA and recruiting class – a wealth of elite depth nationwide in one stroke or discipline makes a big difference in what times are considered more valuable in that event. Events rise at different rates in the NCAA, but when one event gets extremely deep and fast at the college level, it makes high school prospects in those events a little less valuable, relatively, with lots of other veteran options. In the same way, a recruiting class stacked with swimmers in butterfly, for example, would make each butterflier a little less sought-after in the market, with lots of other recruiting options able to provide similar production.

Of course, there’s no way to predict the future, and the most concrete data we have to go on are cold, hard times. These rankings in no way mean that all of these 20 swimmers will be NCAA standouts, and they certainly don’t mean that no swimmer left off this list will make big contributions at the NCAA level.

THIS CLASS

TOP TIMES IN THE CLASS OF 2028

EVENT SWIMMER TIME 50 Free Gabi Brito 21.66 100 Free Gabi Brito 47.77 200 Free Reina Liu 1:44.49 500 Free Brinkleigh Hansen 4:38.51 1000 Free** Brinkleigh Hansen 9:38.87 1650 Free Ellie Clarke 16:09.17 100 Back Reina Liu 51.00 200 Back Daniela Linares Danzos 1:51.87 100 Breast Mikayla Tan 59.04 200 Breast Mikayla Tan 2:06.74 100 Fly Gabi Brito 50.74 200 Fly Ellie Clarke 1:53.62 200 IM Gabi Brito 1:55.76 400 IM Ellie Clarke 4:06.77

**The 1000 free isn’t an event at the Division I NCAA Championships, but is swum instead of the 1650 in many Division I dual meets and is part of the NCAA program in Division II.

Of course, there’s no way to predict the future, and the most concrete data we have to go on are cold, hard times. These rankings in no way mean that all of these 20 swimmers will be NCAA standouts, and they certainly don’t mean that no swimmer left off this list will make big contributions at the NCAA level.

Disclaimer: There are a lot of high school seniors in the country, and no really good, complete, 100% accurate listing of them all. If you don’t see your favorite swimmer on the list, feel free to politely point them out in the comments. There’s a chance that we disagree with your assessment of their spot in the top 20, and so long as it’s done civilly, there’s no problem with differences of opinion. There’s also a chance that we’ve simply missed a no-brainer (we’ve taken every precaution to avoid that), and if that happens, we want to make sure we correct it.

BEST OF THE REST

In the Best of the Rest section, we outline a few standouts who didn’t quite crack the top 20 or an Honorable Mention spot.

Verbal commitments are listed where they’ve been reported. Each of these athletes is still an extremely high-level recruit:

Sprint free: Jane Garlock (22.7/49.1/1:51.5, 55.5 BK) Grace Perry (23.0/49.8/1:46.9, 53.3/2:01.0 FLY, 2:00.1 IM) Leah Inman (22.5/49.2/1:47.8, 54.9 BK, 2:03.8 IM) Paige Kowal (23.4/49.4/1:46.8/4:52.2, 2:01.9/4:17.1 IM) Zona Smith (22.9/49.7/1:47.7, 54.4/1:59.9 BK) Lillian Andedo (22.6/49.8, 56.8 BK) Distance free: Clare Herfel (1:49.2/4:45.0/9:47/16:20) Ella Hafner (23.5/50.7/1:47.5/4:48.8/9:51/16:25) Jane Chevalier (1:48.4/4:47.6/9:50/16:37, 2:01.3 FLY, 4:17.3 IM) Katherine Warkentin (4:53.2/9:49/16:37, 1:02.5/2:16.0 BR) Cassie Espinoza (1:50.4/4:51.1/9:54/16:38) Backstroke: McKenzie Cory (24.8/53.1/1:54.1, 23.6/51.3 FR) AB Curtis (53.0/1:56.2, 22.8/49.5/1:48.2 FR, 2:01.2 IM) Kennedy Nuttbrock (53.6/1:55.4, 1:50.1 FR) Sydney Wasylenky (53.9/1:56.2, 23.4/49.5/1:50.1 FR) Thea Bike (53.5/1:55.6, 54.8 FLY) Breaststroke: Skylar Zulegar (1:00.7/2:12.9) Maya McCarney (1:01.1/2:12.8, 2:02.8/4:23.1 IM, 55.4 FLY) Salem Bahr (1:00.6/2:11.1, 2:02.5 IM) Abigail Bonham (1:01.9/2:11.2, 2:02.2/4:16.1) Isabella Green (1:01.1/2:12.8, 55.7 BK, 55.5 FLY, 2:01.8 IM) Brenley Bonez (1:00.8/2:16.1, 23.0/50.8 FR, 55.7 FLY) Butterfly: Eryn Arnold (53.2/1:57.1, 23.7/51.3/1:49.8 FR, 1:03.8 BR, 1:59.7/4:17.3 IM) Feagin Kaminski (53.7/1:58.5, 23.0/50.1/1:48.5 FR, 55.0/1:57.5 BK) Siggy Nymo (53.2/1:58.9, 23.3/51.3 FR, 54.5/1:57.7 BK, 2:02.2 IM) Bobbi Simmons (53.3, 49.9/1:48.5 FR, 53.9/1:57.3 BK, 2:00.5 IM) Peyton McDaniel (53.5/2:02.2, 22.9/49.9 FR) Lilly King (53.5, 23.4/50.8 FR, 54.3/1:59.2 BK) IM: Clara Seemann (2:00.6/4:12.1, 1:48.7/4:49.4/9:49 FR, 1:01.5/2:11.9 BR) Una Diaz (2:00.2/4:14.3, 1:50.0/4:48.6/9:49/16:48 FR, 54.4/1:55.8 BK) Yari Brock (2:00.7/4:13.3, 50.7/1:47.6/4:48.6/16:46, 1:59.9 BK, 54.9/2:01.3 FLY) Annie Shall (2:00.9/4:12.5, 1:02.4/2:12.8 BR, 1:59.3 FLY) Kinley Baber (2:00.5/4:14.5, 51.5 FR, 1:03.0/2:12.5 BR, 55.2/1:59.2 FLY) June Delmar (1:59.3/4:15.1, 23.3/51.2/1:49.7 FR, 1:59.4 BK, 2:15.4 BR, 55.3/1:58.7 FLY) Kaylee Dietrich (2:02.5/4:14.0, 1:50.5/4:51.0/16:47 FR, 1:03.1/2:13.6 BR, 2:01.2 FLY) Kiera Powers (1:59.7/4:18.5, 23.7/51.3/1:47.8 FR)

HONORABLE MENTIONS

Paring the list down to 20 always feels like pulling teeth. This isn’t an exhaustive list of others we considered, but the top few left off the list who made the decisions on 18-20 very difficult.

Note that in references to the NCAA cutline, we’re using what the cutline would have been under the old qualifying format (not the 2026 process that included auto conference qualifiers).

Meghan Ayres – Cavalier Aquatics/Piedmont Family YMCA – Western Albemarle High School – Crozet, VA

Best Times:

400 IM: 4:14.24 1650 free: 16:36.88 1000 free: 9:52.92 500 free: 4:45.24 200 free: 1:47.86 100 breast: 1:02.69 200 breast: 2:15.00 200 IM: 2:03.54

Ayres is an all-arounder who takes on daunting event schedules, with distance free, the 200 breast and 400 IM typically being in her lineup at taper meets. A member of Cavalier Aquatics, Ayres set new best times in the majority of her best events last season and currently has three times within 2% of the NCAA cutline: 500 free, 1650 free and 400 IM. After hitting a PB of 4:46.90 in the 500 free in April 2025, she went 4:45 three times last season, culminating with a 4:45.24 at the Virginia Senior Championships in March, where she claimed the victory. She also set a best time of 1:47.86 in the 200 free at that meet, and then later in the month, won the YMCA National SC title in the 400 IM (4:14.24) with a new best time while adding runner-up finishes in the 500, 1000 and 1650 free. Her best time in the mile stands at 16:36.88, set at the 2024 Winter Juniors – East, but despite not lowering it in her sophomore year, she was close, clocking 16:37.97 at the 2025 Winter Juniors to snag a top-eight finish. She projects as a 500/1650 free, 400 IM swimmer in college who can also be an asset in breaststroke in dual meets, and a potential 800 free relay contributor at some point in her career.

Lane Francis – NOVA of Virginia Aquatics – Freeman High School – Richmond, VA

Best Times:

50 free: 22.57 100 free: 49.86 100 back: 52.37 200 back: 1:54.71 100 fly: 54.47 200 IM: 2:01.89 200 free: 1:50.06 50 back: 24.82

Francis is an elite sprinter who made dramatic improvements across the board in her sophomore year, putting her in the upper echelon of sprint freestylers in the class with an ability in backstroke that’s at a similar level. Coming into the season as a 23.2/50.8 free sprinter, Francis got down to 22.75 in the 50 free at Winter Juniors – East, and also split 49.88 on the 400 free relay. She followed up by winning the VHSL Class 5 state title with another best time in the 50 free (22.64) in February, and then at the Virginia Senior Championships, she fired off numerous PBs, including a 22.57 in the 50 free and 49.93 in the 100 free. She chipped a few more one-hundredths off her 100 free best a few weeks later at NCSAs, clocking 49.86. In backstroke, she went from owning 54.19/1:55.92 best times to becoming a 52.37/1:54.71 swimmer, also hitting multiple sub-25 swims in the 50 back. To supplement her freestyle and backstroke prowess, Francis is also a developing butterflier (54.4) and IMer (2:01.8), making her a valuable asset for whichever college team she picks over the course of the season. In championship meets, she’s likely a 50/100 free and 100 back swimmer who can contribute to the free relays.

Kate McKinnon – Aquawolves Swim Team – Cherry Creek High School – Centennial, CO

Best Times:

200 free: 1:46.70 100 free: 48.66 50 free: 22.64 100 fly: 54.02 200 IM: 2:00.73 (altitude-adjusted) 400 IM: 4:24.62

McKinnon is one of the best three-distance sprint freestylers in the class with times in the 50, 100 and 200 that are competitive with the top end of the class. She’s already been sub-23 in the 50 free eight times, six of which have been 22.79 or faster, with her PB coming this past February in 22.64. In the 100 free, she had a breakthrough swim of sorts in March 2025, clocking 49.18, and then this past season, broke 49 for the first time at Winter Juniors–West in December (48.95) and then got down to a blistering 48.66 at the Four Corners Speedo Sectionals in late March. In the 200 free, she dropped two seconds over the course of last season to clock 1:46.70 at the Fort Corners Sectionals. Only five swimmers in the class have broken 49 seconds in the 100 free, while she’s one of eight who are sub-1:47 in the 200. She’s also taken steps in the 100 fly and 200 IM over the past season, and those two races were in her individual lineup at the Four Corners Sectionals along with the three free events. The Cherry Crook High Schooler and Aquawolves Swim Team member is likely a 50/100/200 freestyler in the NCAA postseason with relay value, but could also contribute in sprint fly or IM in dual meets.

Aubrial MacKay – OLY Swimming – Owosso, MI

Best Times: 

200 fly: 1:56.82 100 fly: 53.09 100 back: 53.69 200 back: 1:57.33 200 free: 1:49.43 100 free: 50.84 50 free: 23.12 200 IM: 2:01.37 400 IM: 4:19.64

MacKay is coming off a very strong year that started strong at Winter Juniors – East in December and then continued to build throughout the first three months of 2026. She dropped two and a half seconds off her 200 fly best time over the course of the season, going from 1:59.32 to 1:57.76 at Winter Juniors, and then unleashing a time of 1:56.82 in the NCSA final to land 3rd place and put her within half a second of the NCAA cutline. She’s clearly developed an ability to hold steady over the back half of the 200 fly, splitting 30.64/30.29 coming home in her NCSA swim, and there should be more room for improvement as she continues to build her front-end speed. MacKay took off a second last season in the 100 fly to get down to 53.09, while her backstroke best times evolved from 55.0/2:00.8 coming in to 53.6/1:57.3 at the end of the season. Her versatility extends to sprint free, having made big drops to clock 23.1/50.8/1:49.4 last season, and her 2:01.3 200 IM marked an improvement of more than two seconds from the previous year. The 100 and 200 fly figure to be her main focus in college, while the 100 back could also factor into her lineup, though it coincides with the 100 fly. If she opts to avoid doubles, the 50 free or 200 IM could be her #3 event at NCAAs.

Stella Canoles – Orinda Aquatics – Campolindo High School – Lafayette, CA

Best Times:

50 free: 22.43 100 free: 49.17 200 free: 1:47.93 100 fly: 53.87 200 fly: 1:59.43 100 back: 54.95 200 back: 2:01.64 200 IM: 2:03.30

Canoles had an electric season that was highlighted by what she did at Winter Juniors – West in December, where she earned a pair of top-six finishes in the sprint free events while also setting best times in the 100 fly and 100 back and throwing down some notable relay splits. The Orinda Aquatics product had broken out in May 2025 when she set new best times of 22.49 in the 50 free and 49.26 in the 100 free at the CIF State Championships, and then at Winter Juniors, she improved on both, placing 5th in the 50 free (22.43) and 6th in the 100 free (49.17). She also produced relay splits of 22.03 and 22.16 in the 50 free, and at a meet later in the season, split 48.96 in the 100 free, showing an ability to step up on relays. Canoles also put up a pair of 53.87s in the 100 fly at Winter Juniors to place 13th, and then went that exact time for the third time at the Speedo Sectionals in Roseville, showing remarkable consistency. And although the 50 free, 100 free and 100 fly are clearly her best events, she took steps with new bests in the 200 free (1:47.93) and 200 fly (1:59.43) as well last year, further developing her range. The only blip on her otherwise stellar last 12 months was the 2026 CIF State Championships in May, where she only took 10th in the 50 free (23.41) and 6th in the 100 free (50.51) after winning the 100 and placing 2nd in the 50 in 2025.

Katrin Otaegi – San Ramon Valley Aquatics – Dublin, CA 

Best Times:

100 fly: 53.18 100 back: 53.28 200 IM: 1:59.96 50 free: 22.67 100 free: 49.57 200 free: 1:48.36 200 back: 1:58.58 400 IM: 4:22.73

Otaegi is a versatile sprinter who excels in free, back and fly, and as a result, is a decent 200 IMer as one of only a dozen in this class under 2:00. Her lifetime bests in the 100 back (53.28), 100 fly (53.18) and 200 IM (1:59.96) are all within 3% of the NCAA cutline and could make up her future event schedule if she’s willing to tackle the 100 back/100 fly double. She’s also among the top 12 swimmers in the class with her 22.67 best time in the 50 free, which could end up factoring into her individual schedule as well. Add in the 49.5 100 free she produced at the Roseville Sectionals in March and her 1:48.3 200 free from the Far Western Championships in April, and Otaegi makes for a likely free relay player down the line. Note that Otaegi has a 23.85 50 back swim on record from a 200 medley relay, but given that she went 24.83 in the individual race at the same meet, it’s possible that was due to a timing malfunction. Either way, she’s got some backstroke speed that should lend itself to the medley relays in her future college career.

Allison Kelly – Bolles School Sharks – Bolles School – Jupiter, FL

Best Times:

200 free: 1:45.80 100 free: 49.72 50 free: 23.61 500 free: 4:47.96 100 back: 55.76 200 back: 2:00.71 100 fly: 55.67 200 IM: 2:04.79

Kelly’s bread and butter is the 200 free. She’s the second-fastest swimmer in the class after breaking through with a 1:45.80 performance at the FHSAA Class 1A State Championships in November, a swim that marked her first time under 1:48. She was the runner-up in both the 100 and 200 free at those state championships, also setting a personal best of 49.72 in the former. The Bolles School Sharks product leans more towards the 500 free (4:47.96) than the 50 free (23.61) as a third event, though it’s worth noting her best time in the 500 stems from December 2024. She backed up her 1:45.8 200 free swim in November with a solid 1:46.9 showing in March, and she’s had a promising start to the long course season. Kelly also made big steps last season in the backstroke events, though for now she projects as a pure freestyler in college.

TOP 20 SWIMMERS FROM THE CLASS OF 2028

20. Madalyn Petty – Tyler Rose Aquatic Club – Tyler Legacy High School – Tyler, TX

Best Times: 

1650 free: 16:18.88 1000 free: 9:39.21 500 free: 4:43.22 200 free: 1:48.68 400 IM: 4:16.14

Petty is a distance freestyler who made big developments in her 400 IM last season. After setting best times at the 2024 Winter Juniors – West in the 500 free (4:46.57), 1650 free (16:20.70) and 400 IM (4:23.52), she missed the 2025 Winter Juniors but saved her best short course performance of last season for the Speedo Sectionals in Justin in early March. There, Petty swept the 500 free (4:43.22), 1000 free (9:39.21), 1650 free (16:18.88) and 400 IM (4:16.14), setting personal best times across the board. Her time in the mile puts her just shy of the 2026 NCAA cutline (16:18.61) and ranks her 4th in the class, while in the 500, she’s just over a second off the cutline and ranks 3rd in the class. In the 400 IM, Petty dropped more than seven seconds last season, with her 4:16.14 best time falling within 4% of the NCAA cutline. She also brought her 200 free down to 1:48.68 last season, and though it’s her only time sub-1:50, it gives her options for her third event.

19. Emma Grace Richardson – SwimMAC Carolina – Myers Park High School – Charlotte, NC

Best Times: 

100 fly: 52.13 200 fly: 1:59.77 50 free: 22.87 100 free: 49.98 200 IM: 2:03.03 100 breast: 1:04.64 100 back: 56.79

Richardson has established herself as one of the top fly sprinters in the class, having been 52-point eight times in her career already. At the age of 14 in December 2024, she produced a time of 52.41 at Winter Juniors – East, which ranks her 6th all-time in the girls’ 13-14 age group. Since aging up, Richardson reset her best time to 52.13 in the 100 fly in November, ranking her 14th all-time among 15-year-olds. That swim also puts her within a tenth of the NCAA cutline (52.03) and ranks 4th in the class. Beyond the 100 fly, the SwimMAC Carolina product made notable improvements in the 50 free (22.87), 100 free (49.98) and 200 fly (1:59.77) last season that give her four solid events to build off over the next two seasons. In her 200 fly PB swim, Richardson split 55.94/1:03.83, so it will be interesting to see if she can figure out how to hold things together more on the back half over the next few years, or if her focuses is geared more towards the sprint free events to go along with the 100 fly.

18. Kennedi Southern – Lakeside Aquatic Club – Little Elm, TX

Best Times:

50 free: 22.34 100 free: 48.52 100 fly: 54.69 100 back: 55.71 200 free: 1:50.77

Southern jumps off the page as one of the best sprint freestylers in the class, the most valuable discipline in college swimming due to the relay impact. She’s the third-fastest swimmer in the class in the 100 free after dropping a new best time of 48.52 at Winter Juniors – West in December, where she placed 3rd in a competitive final won by fellow class of 2028 recruit Gabi Brito. Southern was also 4th in the 50 free at the meet in 22.34, ranking her 4th in the class, with Brito leading the way. Southern was also 22.5/48.9 as a 14-year-old during her freshman year of high school, ranking her 13th and 11th all-time in the 13-14 age group, respectively. She’ll be a key piece of her future college team’s sprint relays throughout her career —she’s split 22.03 twice on relays in the 50—with potential to be scoring in both events individually. Her 100 fly also improved by two seconds last season in 54.69, giving her a solid third event. She’s better in the 50 fly for the time being, having been as fast as 23.82 from a flat start.

17. Alex Siegel – Long Island Aquatic Club – Merrick, NY

Best Times:

1650 free: 16:15.48 1000 free: 9:45.43 500 free: 4:47.07 200 free: 1:49.29 400 IM: 4:18.58

Siegel is one of just nine swimmers in the class who has an NCAA qualifying time on their resume, as her 16:15.48 best time in the 1650 free is more than three seconds under the 2026 qualifying threshold (16:18.61). She set that PB en route to winning the NCSA spring title this past March, knocking six seconds off her previous mark set at the same meet the year prior. At the Katie Ledecky Invitational in December, she set new bests in the 200 free (1:49.29), 500 free (4:47.42), 1000 free (9:45.43) and 400 IM (4:21.90), and then at NCSAs, in addition to the mile, she lowered her bests again in the 500 free (4:47.07) and 400 IM (4:18.58), showing a steady improvement curve. That’s continued into the long course season, having reset her PBs in the 400, 800 and 1500 free, and the 400 IM, at the Pro Swim Series stop in Indianapolis last month. Despite being one of the few in the class with an NCAA qualifying time, Siegel’s ranking dips a bit due to distance swimmers having diminished value in the college swimming format. Her primary focus will be on the 1650 free, and the 500 free and 400 IM will also likely feature in her NCAA postseason lineup. Developing those two events into NCAA cutline territory while pushing her mile into scoring range looks like the next step after a strong sophomore year.

16. Sarah Zhang – Revolution Aquatic Club – Gator Swim Club – Lexington, MA

Best Times:

400 IM: 4:12.89 200 breast: 2:11.71 100 breast: 1:02.05 1650 free: 16:24.90 200 IM: 2:02.34 500 free: 4:52.38

Zhang has a wide-ranging skillset with elite ability across the 200 breast, 400 IM and 1650 free. Her best event on paper is the mile, as her 16:24.90 lifetime best is within 1% of the NCAA cutline, but her 200 breast and 400 IM pop a little more when it comes to her development and future scoring potential in college. She exploded in the 400 IM last season, improving her best time from 4:21.13 to 4:12.89, while her 200 breast improved by over two seconds down to 2:11.71. With two more years of high school, she’s just over three seconds off the NCAA cutline in the 400 IM and within two and a half in the 200 breast. In the 1650 free, she dropped nearly 15 seconds last season, and with that event permanently moving to the opening day of the NCAA Championships, Zhang could stick with these core three events in college. She also made improvements in the 500 free (4:52.38), 100 breast (1:02.05) and 200 IM (2:02.34) last season, which, while all a step below her 1650 free/200 breast/400 IM, make her a valuable asset for teams in dual meets.

15. Ellie Stanley – Tennessee Aquatics – Maryville High School – Maryville, TN

Best Times:

200 fly: 1:57.35 100 fly: 53.45 400 IM: 4:15.57 200 IM: 2:00.15 200 free: 1:50.05 100 free: 50.87 50 free: 23.55 100 back: 56.06

Stanley is one of the top butterfly swimmers in the class, with her 200 being her best event after back-to-back seasons posting 1:57-mids. Stanley went 1:57.41 as a 15-year-old in March 2025, and then reset her best time this past January at the Tennessee Aquatics Invite in 1:57.35, putting her just over a second shy of the NCAA cutline and ranking her sixth in the class. Among the five swimmers ahead of her in the 200, Stanley’s 100 fly is faster than two of them, making her one of the best two-event fliers in the class. She’s been under 54 seconds four times, having lowered her best time from 53.89 to 53.45 last season. For a third event, Stanley had a big drop in the 400 IM last season, getting down to 4:15.57 (from 4:18.93) to come within approximately 2.5% of the cutline. However, the NCAA schedule has the 100 fly and 400 IM back-to-back, likely indicating Stanley will swim the 200 IM in the postseason, having improved by eight-tenths last season in 2:00.15. The Tennessee native is also a developing freestyler, and it will be interesting to see if her 23.5/50.8/1:50.0 best times improve this season and make her a potential free relay candidate down the line.

14. Maggie Dickinson – Schroeder Swim Team – Whitefish Bay High School – Milwaukee, WI

Best Times:

200 back: 1:53.40 100 back: 52.56 100 free: 49.17 50 free: 22.65 50 back: 24.50 100 fly: 55.29

Dickinson is an elite backstroker who also projects to be a key sprint free relay player in college. The Schroeder Swim Team product has been 52-point in the 100 back and 1:53-point in the 200 back for two straight seasons, putting her right near the top of the class in both events. Dickinson went 1:53.40 as a high school freshman in the 200 back, ranking her 14th all-time among 15-year-olds in the U.S., and she was also 52.66 in the 100 back. This past season, she lowered her best time to 52.56 in the 100 back at Winter Juniors – West, placing 3rd, while in the 200 back, she went 1:53 twice, including 1:53.81 en route to placing 2nd at Winter Juniors. At the YMCA SC Championships in late March, Dickinson won titles in the 100 free (49.17), 100 back (53.04) and 200 back (1:53.43), setting a new best in the 100 free and a season-best in the 200 back, while delivering a 24.50 back best time and a 1:47.78 200 free leg on relays. A theoretical NCAA schedule for Dickinson would likely include the 50 free as her third event, having been 22.75 as a freshman and then 22.65 as a sophomore. Her 200 back best time from last season is just five one-hundredths shy of the NCAA cutline, so with continued improvement over the next two seasons, Dickinson is a likely scorer immediately when she gets to college. Most recently, she went 28.58 in the long course 50 back at the Indianapolis Pro Swim, which ranks 16th all-time in the girls’ 15-16 age group. That speed says she’s likely the future lead-off swimmer of a 200 medley relay at NCAAs.

13. Grace Koenig-Song – NASA Wildcat Aquatics – Chicago, IL

Best Times:

200 breast: 2:10.83 100 breast: 1:00.28 200 IM: 1:59.83 400 IM: 4:17.82 50 free: 22.99 100 free: 49.98 200 free: 1:51.32 50 breast: 27.98

Koenig-Song is the third-fastest swimmer in the class in both breaststroke events and also boasts a sub-2:00 best time in the 200 IM. The NASA Wildcat Aquatics member has been one of the best breaststrokers in the country for her age throughout her young career, currently owning NAG records for 11-12 girls in the SCY 100 breast (1:02.02) and for 13-14 girls in the LCM 50 breast (31.80). She’s continued to improve through her sophomore year of high school, hitting new bests in the 100 breast (1:00.28) and 200 breast (2:10.83) last season to rank 3rd in the class in both and pull within 3% of the NCAA cutline. Her 200 breast PB came at Winter Juniors – West, where she earned a 3rd-place finish, while in the 100 breast, she produced her 1:00.28 best en route to winning the NCSA junior title—where she also won the 50 breast (27.99). Koenig-Song also broke 2:00 for the first time in the 200 IM at Winter Juniors in 1:59.83, and then backed that up by doing it again at NCSAs in 1:59.90. And while those are likely the three individual events she’ll focus on in college, she’s also turned into a very solid sprint freestyler, having broken 23 in the 50 and 50 in the 100 to give her some additional relay value. With a takeover, she’s been as fast as 22.55/49.77 in the 50/100 free, and she’s also been 27.45 in the 50 breast.

12. Jianna Amores – South Florida Stallions – Mater Lakes Academy – Miami, FL

Best Times:

100 fly: 51.78 200 fly: 1:58.70 100 back: 54.43 100 free: 50.35 50 free: 23.69 200 IM: 2:03.42

Amores is one of just nine swimmers in the class owning a 2026 NCAA-qualifying time with her sizzling 51.78 PB in the 100 fly, which makes her one of just two in the class sub-52. The FHSAA Class 2A state champion from Mater Lakes Academy entered the 2025-26 season with a best time of 53.18 in the 100 fly, having produced that swim in June 2025, and then broke 53 for the first time en route to winning the Florida state title in November (52.58). At Winter Juniors – East in December, Amores unleashed her current best time of 51.78 in the final, taking the runner-up position behind Charlotte Crush to get well under the NCAA cutline (52.03) and within striking distance of scoring position (51.33). In the 200 fly, Amores brought her best time down from 2:00.30 to 1:58.70 at Winter Juniors, winning the ‘C’ final. She’s still developing in that event, and once she’s able to close the last 50 a little stronger, she should be pushing the NCAA cutline. The South Florida Stallions member just set a new long course PB en route to winning the ‘A’ final at the Ocala Sectionals in the 200 fly, which is a big step in the right direction. She also set best times in the 100 free (50.35) and 100 back (54.43) last season, which serve as good secondary events in her program. Getting her 100 free into the 49s this season will go a long way in increasing her relay value.

11. Heba Fouitah – Aiken-Augusta Swim League – Lakeside High School – Augusta, GA

Best Times:

200 IM: 1:58.51 100 fly: 53.03 200 free: 1:46.96 100 free: 49.59 50 free: 22.86 200 back: 1:56.34 100 back: 53.57 400 IM: 4:15.24 200 fly: 2:00.20 200 breast: 2:16.65

Fouitah is an incredibly versatile swimmer coming off a strong sophomore season that saw her set new best times in all of her primary events. On paper, her best event is the 200 IM, having dropped more than a second last season in 1:58.51, pulling her within 1% of the NCAA cutline. Her most impressive leaps forward last season came in the 200 free and 100 fly, where she dropped two seconds apiece to post respective times of 1:46.96 and 53.03. In the 200 free, she’s one of just eight in the class under 1:47, while in the 100 fly, she’s sixth-fastest amongst the group. The Aiken-Augusta Swim League product has a sprint free arsenal that gives her plenty of relay value, including setting a new PB of 22.86 in the 50 in late June. She’s also 49.5 in the 100 and more importantly has been 48.6 from a takeover. Her backstroke times are also competitive and she dropped four seconds last season in the 400 IM, but her focus in college likely surrounds the 200 IM, 100 fly and 200 free. Of course, with the 100 fly and 200 free being conflicting events, the 100 free or 200 back could also be options for her to swim individually.

10. Emma Hussein – Canyon Aquatic Club – West Ranch High School – Stevenson Ranch, CA

Best Times:

200 IM: 1:57.23 400 IM: 4:12.37 100 breast: 1:01.21 200 breast: 2:11.26 100 fly: 53.76 100 back: 54.83 200 back: 1:59.87 50 free: 23.40 100 free: 51.32 200 free: 1:51.43

Hussein is an elite medley swimmer who made big improvements in breaststroke and butterfly last season, making her a true all-arounder and a top-10 recruit. Just over two months ago, she won the CIF Southern Section D1 title in the 200 IM in a time of 1:57.23, marking her fourth career swim sub-2:00 and a new PB by more than two seconds relative to where she was entering the season. The time puts her under the NCAA cutline and ranks 4th in the class. She was also the runner-up in the 100 breast at the meet, clocking 1:01.21 to mark a best by nearly two seconds, and then a few weeks later, fired off a massive PB of 2:11.26 in the 200 breast. She came into the season with respective bests of 1:03.10 and 2:17.00, so her breaststroke really reached a new level in 2025-26. The Canyon Aquatic Club member also has a 400 IM PB of 4:12.37, which is within 2% of the cutline, and add that to owning a sub-54 100 fly best time and sub-55 100 back PB, and her versatility is really something that stands out. Freestyle is a relative weakness, but she’s coming along after setting bests in the 50, 100 and 200 (23.4/51.3/1:51.4) last season.

9. Avery Daigle – Franco’s Fins – Mandeville High School – Mandeville, LA

Best Times:

50 free: 22.21 100 free: 48.94 100 fly: 53.57 100 back: 53.79 50 back: 24.69 200 IM: 2:01.72 200 back: 2:00.47 200 free: 1:49.20

Daigle is a talented sprinter whose bread and butter is the 50 and 100 free but can also throw down in the 100 back and 100 fly. The event that jumps out for the Mandeville, La., native is the 50 free, where she’s been 22.85 or faster eight separate times, headlined by the 22.21 that she dropped at Winter Juniors – West in December. That swim qualified her 1st out of the prelims before placing 2nd in the final in 22.28. She set her best time of 48.94 in the 100 free at the same meet, winning the ‘B’ final, and those two performances rank 3rd (50 free) and 5th (100 free) in the class. At the Louisiana Senior State Championships in February, her momentum continued with best times in the 200 free (1:49.20), 50 back (24.69) and 100 fly (53.57) while also claiming titles in the 50 free (22.66) and 100 free (49.06). The biggest takeaway from that meet, however, might be the 21.63 anchor leg she dropped en route to giving the Franco’s Fins a comeback win in the 200 free relay. That’s an elite split no matter who you’re talking about, let alone a high school sophomore. Her relay value will be immense in college, with an ability to contribute on all four 200/400 relays, and the individual program will be the 50 and 100 free, with the 100 fly likely serving as the third event.

8. Brinkleigh Hansen – Saint Petersburg Aquatics – Saint Petersburg High School – Saint Petersburg, FL

Best Times:

500 free: 4:38.51 (best in class) 1000 free: 9:38.87 (best in class) 1650 free: 16:18.11 200 free: 1:46.27 400 IM: 4:15.85 200 fly: 1:59.88

Distance freestylers often slide down the rankings simply because they have fewer opportunities to impact the team race. They’re usually not in any relays, and many of them are only a scoring threat in one individual race, sometimes two, and rarely three. For Hansen, she has a decorated resume that includes winning the 2024 World Junior Open Water title in the girls’ 5km, claiming a silver medal as a member of the U.S. girls’ 4×200 free relay at the 2025 World Junior Championships, and she’s also represented the U.S. at the World Championships in open water. In short course yards, she leads the class with her best times in the 500 free (4:38.51) and 1000 free (9:38.87), both produced last season. Her time in the 500 is NCAA scoring worthy (4:39.19 was the 16th place cut-off in 2026), while her PB of 16:18.11 in the 1650 is under the NCAA cutline (and ranks 3rd in the class). Helping boost her case in the rankings is her development last season in the 200 free, dropping a best time of 1:46.27 to finish as the FHSAA Class 3 State Championship runner-up, which makes her a future candidate for the 800 free relay. Her 400 IM best of 4:15.85 also puts her in good shape if that’s an event she wants to target in the future. Her run of good form has continued into the summer, setting long course bests in the 200, 800 and 1500 free last month at the Mel Zajac Jr. International meet.

7. Shelby Hutchinson – South Jersey Aquatic Club – Haddon Township High School – Haddon Township, NJ

Best Times:

100 back: 51.87 200 back: 1:55.49 100 fly: 52.26 50 free: 22.63 100 free: 49.51 200 fly: 2:03.63 50 back: 24.52

Hutchinson went on a tear through the first few months of 2026, elevating herself into the top 10 with some breakthrough performances in back, fly and free. At Winter Juniors – East in December, she set lifetime bests in the 50 free (23.29), 100 back (53.11), 200 back (1:55.49) and 100 fly (53.04), but that was only the beginning of her run of good form. She set best times in the 50 free (23.16), 100 free (50.16), 50 back (24.56) and 50 fly (24.35) in January, then dropped a pair of massive swims in the 100 back (51.87) and 100 fly (52.26) at the NISAA Meet of Champions in late February, the former putting her just four one-hundredths off the NCAA cutline and the latter within 23 one-hundredths. She wrapped up the short course season with a bang at the Middle Atlantic Senior Championships in March, winning gold and setting best times in the 50 free (22.63), 100 free (49.51) and 50 back (24.52) while also claiming the 100 back, 200 back and 100 fly titles. As a versatile sprinter, Hutchinson will face the classic 100 back/100 fly double in college that many swimmers deal with, and given they’re arguably her two best events, she fits the bill of someone willing to take on both races back-to-back. The 200 back is likely her third event, but her sprint free came a long way last season, meaning either the 50 or 100 could be an option, and of course, she’s got plenty of relay value. Her 24.5 50 back is already at an elite level, and she’s split 23.7 in the 50 fly from a flying start.

6. Daniela Linares Danzos – Pleasanton Seahawks – San Ramon Valley High School – Danville, CA

Best Times:

200 back: 1:51.87 (best in class) 100 back: 52.60 50 back: 24.60 100 fly: 53.18 100 free: 50.62 50 free: 23.44 200 IM: 2:01.37 400 IM: 4:23.99 200 fly: 2:01.56 200 free: 1:52.22

Linares Danzos took over as the top swimmer in the class in the 200 back after dropping nearly two seconds from her lifetime best in May. In between the CIF North Coast Section Championships and the CIF State Championships, Pleasanton Seahawks swimmer put up a time of 1:51.87 in the event, overtaking Reina Liu‘s 1:52.17 for top billing in the class. That performance puts Linares Danzos inside NCAA scoring range, as 1:51.97 was required to earn a point at the 2026 championships. And despite the fact that’s her only career swim under 1:53.5, she’s carried her 200 back momentum into the long course season, breaking the Mexican National Record twice, ultimately going 2:09.89 to rank 19th all-time in the 15-16 age group. Linares Danzos also set best times in the 100 back (52.60) and 100 fly (53.18) last season, giving her a strong three-event lineup for her college career. Her freestyle is still developing, but improvements over the next two seasons could results in her being a free relay contributor.

5. Karina Plaza – Mecklenburg Swim Association – Myers Park High School – Charlotte, NC

Best Times:

200 breast: 2:09.40 100 breast: 59.94 200 IM: 1:57.44 400 IM: 4:12.12 200 back: 1:55.72 100 back: 53.47 50 back: 24.75 200 free: 1:47.66 100 free: 50.48

Plaza had a historic freshman year of high school, becoming the youngest female swimmer ever under the 1:00 barrier in the 100 breaststroke. Fourteen at the time, Plaza put up a time of 59.94 in the 100 breast at the North Carolina Swimming SC Age Group Championships in February 2025, breaking the decade-old 13-14 NAG record of 1:00.02 held by former UVA star Alexis Wenger. Plaza followed up the next day by setting another NAG record in the 200 breast, clocking 2:09.40. She also set her 200 and 400 IM best times in February 2025, posting respective mark of 1:57.44 and 4:12.12. All four of those times remain her PBs, but that’s not to say Plaza had a bad 2025-26 season. She was 1:01.08/2:11.15 in the breaststroke events, 1:58.3/4:12.7 in the IMs, and set new bests in all three backstrokes (24.7/53.4/1:55.7) to help expand her event range. As the second-fastest breaststroker in the class who is also among the best in the 200 IM and a very solid backstroker, Plaza is one of the more talented swimmers in this group. If she can get her breaststroke back in the sub-1:00/sub-2:10 range while continuing to improve elsewhere, she’ll be dangerous in her junior year.

4. Ellie Clarke – Carmel Swim Club – Carmel High School – Carmel, IN

Best Times:

200 fly: 1:53.62 (best in class) 400 IM: 4:06.77 200 IM: 1:57.73 1650 free: 16:09.17 (best in class) 1000 free: 9:49.27 500 free: 4:41.67 200 back: 1:53.17 100 back: 52.16 100 fly: 53.76 200 free: 1:47.31 100 free: 49.32 50 free: 22.88

Clarke is a dynamic talent who is one of the best swimmers in the class in everything but breaststroke. She leads the class in the 200 fly with an NCAA scoring worthy 1:53.62 best time, while she’s also under the cutline in four other events. That includes her class-leading 1650 free (16:09.17), along with the 500 free (4:41.67), 200 back (1:53.17) and 400 IM (4:06.77). Among those four races, she’s incredibly close to the NCAA scoring cut-off in the mile (16:08.76) and 400 IM (4:06.02). Clarke is just shy of the cutline in the 100 back (52.16) and 200 IM (1:57.73), and her sprint freestyle best times make her a potential free relay contributor at 22.8/49.3/1:47.3. This past season, she helped Carmel win yet another IHSAA state title with individual wins in the 100 back and 200 IM (1:57.73 for a new PB), and then went off at the Four Corners Sectionals in March, rewriting her best times in the 50, 100, 500 and 1650 free, the 100 and 200 back, 200 fly and 400 IM while throwing some impressive relay splits that included 1:45.45 in the 200 free and 23.38 in the 50 fly. At the meet, she went six-for-six in individual gold medals and best times. The only thing working against her in college swimming is the three-event entry limit at the NCAA Championships. Clarke can swim anything, but right now, her most likely lineup would include the 200 fly and 400 IM, and possibly the 1650 free. However, the mile could be on the chopping block in favor of the 200 IM or 500 free. It will all probably depend on the strength of field and her team’s areas of need when these meets roll around, but the one thing we can say for sure is that she projects as a future centerpiece of an NCAA team. It just speaks to how deep the top end of this class is that she ranks 4th.

3. Mikayla Tan – San Ramon Valley Aquatics – San Ramon, CA 

Best Times:

200 breast: 2:06.74 (best in class) 100 breast: 59.04 (best in class) 200 IM: 1:56.13 400 IM: 4:16.03 200 fly: 1:56.88 100 fly: 53.70 200 free: 1:48.55 100 free: 50.37 50 free: 23.42

Tan is a multi-time NAG record holder and could become one of the best breaststrokers we’ve seen in the NCAA over the past decade. This past December at Winter Juniors – West, Tan produced a stunning time of 2:06.74 in the 200 breast, breaking Lydia Jacoby‘s meet record while nearly taking down Alex Walsh‘s 15-16 NAG record of 2:06.40 despite being just 15. That performance gives Tan one of just two NCAA ‘A’ final-qualifying swims in the class—that swim would’ve placed 6th at the 2026 NCAAs, with four of the five swimmers she trails being seniors. She also leads this class in the 100 breast with her best time of 59.04, also set en route to winning the title at Winter Juniors, which is an NCAA qualifying time and just six one-hundredths off what it took to score last season. She added a third PB at Winter Juniors in the 200 IM, placing 2nd in 1:56.13 to rank 3rd in the class and get comfortably under the NCAA scoring threshold. That gives her three high-level events that she’ll likely be able to step right in to college and score in. But beyond that, she’s got impressive best times in the 100 fly (53.70) and 200 fly (1:56.88), the latter of which coming at a casual mid-October meet. She also set new bests in the 50 (23.42), 100 (50.37) and 200 free (1:48.55) last season, and has been 22.6 in the 50 from a takeover. She also has a noteworthy 26.97 50 breast split on her resume. Tan could be an NCAA title contender as soon as her freshman year in the 200 breast, while she’s a likely scorer right from the jump in the 100 breast and 200 IM to go along with being a team’s go-to breaststroker for the medley relays.

2. Reina Liu – TAC Titans – Raleigh Charter High School – Cary, NC

Best Times:

100 back: 51.00 (best in class) 200 back: 1:52.17 200 IM: 1:55.86 200 fly: 1:55.82 100 fly: 52.00 200 free: 1:44.49 (best in class) 100 free: 48.16 50 free: 21.93 400 IM: 4:09.88 50 back: 23.99 200 breast: 2:16.54 100 breast: 1:03.01

Liu is an exceptional swimmer with NCAA qualifying times across six different events, the most of anyone in the class. She has NCAA scoring times in the 100 back, where she leads the class at 51.00, and the 200 IM, where she ranks a close 2nd to Gabi Brito in 1:55.86. Liu also has best times fast enough to earn an NCAA invite in the 50 free (21.93), 200 back (1:52.17), 100 fly (52.00) and 200 fly (1:55.82), ranking 2nd in the class in all but the 100 fly, where she’s 3rd. She’s also the fastest swimmer in the class in the 200 free (1:44.49) and ranks 2nd in the 100 free (48.16). Furthermore, every one of her best times was set this past season, showing that she’s on a steady improvement curve. Similar to Ellie Clarke, Liu almost has too many options for her potential NCAA event lineup. The 100 back, 200 back and 200 IM seems like the most likely setup, and then she can utilize her elite 21.9/48.1/1:44.4 sprint free abilities on the relays. Representing Canada internationally, Liu qualified for the Pan Pacific Championships last week at the Canadian Trials in the women’s 4×100 free relay, meaning she’ll be gaining some critical international experience this summer.

1. Gabi Brito – Beach Cities Alpha – Santa Monica High School – Santa Monica, CA 

Best Times:

100 fly: 50.74 (best in class) 200 IM: 1:55.76 (best in class) 50 free: 21.66 (best in class) 100 free: 47.77 (best in class) 200 free: 1:46.07 100 back: 51.46 200 back: 1:55.57 200 fly: 1:57.52 400 IM: 4:12.69 200 breast: 2:13.04 100 breast: 1:01.60

Brito had some tough competition, but holds the top ranking in this class with her elite abilities across sprint free and fly, coupled with the best 200 IM in the class and strong times in almost every other event on the program. The event that jumps off the page most for Brito is the 100 fly, as the Beach Cities Swimming standout popped off a blistering time of 50.74 at the CIF Southern Section D1 Championships, ranking her 4th all-time in the girls’ 15-16 age group (at 15) and under what it took to make the NCAA ‘A’ final last season. At the same meet, she set a lifetime best of 21.66 in the 50 free, ranking 3rd all-time in the age group and inside NCAA scoring range. Those performances came after she set best times en route to winning titles at Winter Juniors – West in 22.09 (50 free) and 51.55 (100 fly), showing just how much she progressed over the course of last season. She also won the Winter Juniors – West title in the 100 free (47.77), 100 back (51.78) and 200 IM (1:55.99), and then continued to rewrite her personal record book through the first few months of 2026, including clocking 1:46.07 in the 200 free, 51.46 in the 100 back and 23.17 in the 50 fly. The fastest swimmer in the class in four premier events, Brito will be a big-time scorer for her future college program, likely in the 50 free, 100 free and 100 fly, and then what she’ll be able to do on relays is almost scary. She’s so quick in sprint free and fly right now, with her backstroke not far off, so the sky’s the limit.

BONUS LOOKBACK

Feeling nostalgic? Here’s a look back at our historic recruiting class rankings, plus our retrospectives of those classes after four NCAA seasons:

Recruiting Class High School Class of 2028 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores High School Class of 2027 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores Ranks As Juniors High School Class of 2026 Way Too Early Rank As Sophomores Ranks As Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors High School Class of 2025 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores Ranks As Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors High School Class of 2024 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores Ranks As Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors High School Class of 2023 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores Ranks As Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors High School Class of 2022 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores Ranks as Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors High School Class of 2021 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores Ranks as Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2020 Way Too Early Ranks As Sophomores Ranks as Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2019 Ranks as Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2018 Ranks as Juniors Re-Rank As Seniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2017 Ranks as Juniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2016 Ranks as Juniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2015 Ranks as Juniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2014 Ranks as Juniors Post-college retrospective High School Class of 2013 Ranks as Juniors Post-college retrospective

Read the full story on SwimSwam: Way Too Early Recruit Rankings: Girls’ High School Class of 2028

Hence then, the article about way too early recruit rankings girls high school class of 2028 was published today ( Friday 17/07/2026 - 04:16 PM ) and is available on swimswam ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Way Too Early Recruit Rankings: Girls’ High School Class of 2028 )

Also on site :

• Smoky Mets-Phillies conditions caused ‘burning’ eyes — and felt like ‘you were sitting by a campfire’
• Pakistan bowler’s suspension ends after testing positive for substance abuse during T20 World Cup 2026
• Jaffna Kings co-owner arrested by Sri Lankan police over match-fixing allegations on LPL 2026 opening day