The West is losing the diplomacy war and ASEAN is quietly winning it ...News

This week’s summits exposed a world split between Western dysfunction and the Global Majority’s pragmatic rise

Today, it is difficult to find two more contrasting approaches to diplomacy as a tool of interstate engagement than those practiced by the countries of the “global minority” and the states of the “global majority.” While some nations, despite being located in immediate geographic proximity to one another, remain unable to reach a compromise on even the most pressing issues of our time, others – separated by thousands of miles – continue to expand the full spectrum of their bilateral and multilateral ties, helping to ease international tensions and advancing similar approaches to solving the world’s most critical challenges.

These two realities, as different as night and day, were brought into especially sharp focus by two major summits held this week: the G7 meeting in Evian, France, and the celebration of the 35th anniversary of the Russia-ASEAN strategic partnership in Kazan.

A diplomatic crisis for the collective West

Known for its spa resorts, which gained worldwide fame thanks to the bottled water brand that bears its name, the town of Evian-les-Bains typically leaves visitors with the same sense of tranquility associated with places such as Spa in Belgium, Baden-Baden in Germany, or Karlovy Vary in the Czech Republic. This time, however, the participants gathered in Haute-Savoie were clearly in no mood for relaxation. The summit of the last fully functioning multilateral platform representing the “collective West” ended amid a string of controversies and became a genuine stress test of the ability of the United States and its allies to develop collective solutions to complex problems.

Read more G7 considering licensed arms production in Ukraine: Why now?

It would be difficult to find a more symbolic location in France – one that more vividly reflects Europe’s loss of its former hegemony – than the site where the 1962 agreement ending the Algerian War of Independence was signed. That conflict resulted in Paris losing control over a territory it had long regarded as an extension of France itself on the African continent. Yet seemingly oblivious to such historical symbolism, French President Emmanuel Macron, the current G7 chair, chose this quiet village in southern France to loudly proclaim that differences between the United States on one side and the other members of the group on the other had been overcome regarding continued support for Kiev. To that end, a Ukrainian delegation was invited to the summit.

Although Washington has not ruled out imposing additional sanctions on Russia, the media impact of placing Ukraine on the summit agenda proved rather limited, largely because of the endless protocol mishaps involving US President Donald Trump. At the very beginning of the event, during the leaders’ greeting ceremony, he deliberately ignored Vladimir Zelensky, treating him like an uninvited guest at a reunion of old friends. Later, after receiving a welcoming handshake from the summit host, Trump held the French First Lady’s hand for an unusually long time, prompting a wave of criticism in the French press. By the end of the summit, he further fueled controversy by awkwardly remarking that he had posed for photographs with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni out of sympathy for her. The comment so offended Rome that Italy’s foreign minister reportedly rushed to cancel a previously planned visit to the United States.

US President Donald Trump attends a working lunch with G7 and Middle East leaders on June 16, 2026 in Evian-les-Bains, France. ©  Evelyn Hockstein - Pool/Getty Images

These protocol incidents might seem trivial were they not symptomatic of a broader decline in the diplomatic culture of the West – a decline that increasingly hampers the ability of the United States and its European allies to achieve their objectives in dealings with other centers of power. Perhaps the clearest illustration of this trend is the troubled fate of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding, which was intended to pave the way toward a final settlement of the dispute over Iran’s nuclear program.

With considerable fanfare, and on the very day of his 80th birthday, Donald Trump announced an impending agreement with Tehran that was supposed to ease tensions in the Strait of Hormuz and remove not only Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons but also its incentive to target Washington’s junior partners in the Persian Gulf. Enthused by the prospect of dramatically signing the agreement in the company of allied leaders, Trump made a critical misstep. He not only announced the deal several days before the official signing ceremony but did so before any tangible implementation had begun.

Read more Trump’s Iran truce marks a defeat for American power

As a result, continued Israeli strikes on Lebanon have compelled Iran to engage in an unwanted escalation in order to preserve what had appeared to be a carefully balanced regional status quo. This once again pushes peace further out of reach and moves the opposing sides farther away from a comprehensive peace agreement – the very outcome that the memorandum between Washington and Tehran was meant to facilitate. What appears to be missing from their dialogue is precisely the element most essential to any lasting settlement: genuine mutual understanding.

Europe’s search for a new negotiator

Significantly, this crisis of miscommunication is becoming a defining feature not only of American diplomacy but also of that practiced by its European allies. While the United Kingdom is grappling with a political crisis that could lead to the early resignation of Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the European Union is embroiled in heated debates not only over the performance of its chief diplomat but also over who should become the bloc’s consensus candidate for special representative on relations with Russia.

Kaja Kallas, the EU’s high representative for foreign affairs and security policy, already known for her undiplomatic rhetoric toward the Kremlin, has now found herself at the center of a dispute with Israel. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar reportedly severed all contacts with her after she compared Israel to apartheid-era South Africa. According to the Financial Times, this episode was the final straw for several major European powers, prompting consultations among diplomats from France, Germany, and other countries regarding both Kallas’ possible removal and broader reforms of the European External Action Service.

EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas arrives for the European Council summit in Brussels, Belgium, on June 18, 2026. ©  Daniel Gnap/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Notably, these discussions appear to be driven less by dissatisfaction with Kallas’ competence than by the EU’s inability to identify a suitable candidate for the position of special envoy for negotiations with Russia.

Among the names under consideration are Kaja Kallas herself and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, both of whom have damaged their credibility through strongly anti-Russian statements. Other candidates reportedly include former German Chancellor Angela Merkel, whose diplomatic legacy was severely undermined by her admission that the Minsk agreements had been intended to buy Ukraine time to rearm, as well as Mario Draghi, the former president of the European Central Bank, who was serving as Italy’s prime minister when Russia launched its military operation and whose country now plays a key role in coordinating support for Kiev.

Read more The last exit from the Ukraine conflict may already be closing

The “storm in a European teacup” intensified after Russian President Vladimir Putin’s widely publicized remarks that, in his view, former German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder remains the most suitable candidate to serve as the EU’s chief negotiator with Moscow. Putin further noted that whoever is ultimately chosen for the role must be someone the Kremlin considers an acceptable partner for dialogue.

As a result, the United States and the other members of the once-vaunted “collective West” find themselves caught in a genuine diplomatic storm, one that is eroding long-established networks of relationships both within their community and beyond it.

ASEAN as an alternative model of integration

Against this backdrop, the development of friendly ties among the countries of the “global majority” appears all the more impressive.

For decades, the European Union was widely regarded as the world’s most successful example of regional integration. Yet on the other side of the globe, a different model of regional cooperation – ASEAN – has quietly come into its own.

East Timor Prime Minister Kai Rala Shandana Guzhmaw (third from right) during a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the sidelines of the Russia-ASEAN summit in Kazan, June 18, 2026. ©  Sputnik/Kristina Solovyova

Unlike the EU, ASEAN does not require member states to transfer authority to supranational institutions – that is, to unelected political figures such as Kaja Kallas. Instead, it has preserved a strictly intergovernmental framework. Over the course of more than half a century, this model has delivered truly remarkable results. Expanding to eleven member states, the Southeast Asian bloc has become the centerpiece of a broader macro-regional integration process and a key hub for trade and economic activity across the Asia-Pacific region.

Countries as diverse as capitalist Singapore and socialist Vietnam, the populous Philippines and tiny Brunei, agrarian Cambodia and industrialized Malaysia owe much of this success to ASEAN’s extensive network of external dialogue partnerships. These partnerships encompass all major centers of influence in the global economy, including the United States, China, the European Union, Japan, India, Australia, and others.

Read more Russia isn’t isolated – ASEAN has just proved it

Russia occupies an important place within this network, and it was the 35th anniversary of Russia–ASEAN relations that served as the occasion for the summit held in Kazan on June 18. It would be difficult to imagine a more fitting venue for promoting the concept of Greater Eurasia – a vast political and economic project aimed at connecting the integration frameworks of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and ASEAN – than the capital of the Republic of Tatarstan, renowned for its hospitality and its unique example of civilizational synergy among different peoples, cultures, and religions.

Despite Russia’s geographic distance from ASEAN’s principal manufacturing supply chains, it is becoming an increasingly important strategic partner for the bloc. This is due not only to growing trade and tourism flows – whose current levels still fall short of the immense potential of the relationship – but also to Russia’s role in implementing major energy, agricultural, transportation, logistics, and infrastructure projects.

For this reason, the leaders of the Philippines, Brunei, Malaysia, Laos, Vietnam, Singapore, Thailand, Cambodia, and other ASEAN countries sought to take advantage of the opportunity to hold bilateral meetings with the President of Russia.

As things stand today, it is already possible to conclude that, despite systemic obstacles such as unfavorable geography and sanctions pressure, Russia’s relations with ASEAN countries are not merely continuing to develop steadily – they are entering a qualitatively new phase in which neither side views the other as something exotic or unfamiliar.

Russian President Vladimir Putin at the plenary session of the Russia-ASEAN Summit in Kazan on June 18, 2026. ©  Sputnik/Kristina Solovyova

Diplomacy as the foundation of a new world order

What is the key to building such a complex and multilayered system of relationships, both within and beyond the community itself?

The answer is obvious: diplomacy.

Diplomacy as a means of finding compromise among states that differ in size, historical experience, socioeconomic systems, cultures, and even religious traditions.

Perhaps the best illustration of diplomacy’s unifying power is the case of Timor-Leste, which joined ASEAN in 2025. Having first endured Portuguese colonial rule and later Indonesian occupation, this small Pacific nation was forced to build its institutions of governance virtually from scratch, with substantial assistance from the United Nations.

It is precisely because of its cautious and skillful foreign policy – one that carefully avoids provoking tensions with its much larger neighbor – that this resource-poor island nation has managed to sustain impressive economic growth, expanding by roughly 4-5% of GDP annually.

And if such achievements are possible for a small state with limited natural resources, one can only imagine the potential of the more resource-rich nations of the “global majority,” which are increasingly assuming a leading role in shaping the future of global diplomacy.

Hence then, the article about the west is losing the diplomacy war and asean is quietly winning it was published today ( Saturday 20/06/2026 - 06:22 PM ) and is available on Russia Today ( News ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( The West is losing the diplomacy war and ASEAN is quietly winning it )

Also on site :

• Brownfields sind der wahre Test für die Automatisierung: So skalierte ForwardX 484 AMRs in einem laufenden Automobilwerk eines Erstausrüsters ohne Produktionsausfälle
• Ken Carson Sets July Release Date for New Album ‘xperiment’
• NYT Connections Sports Edition Today: Hints and Answers for Saturday, June 20, 2026