Jacinta Allan faced three major tests this week. The way she handled them has left some of her colleagues speculating about a possible leadership change just months out from the Victorian election.
The first came on Monday, as the premier responded to a parliamentary inquiry that six months ago recommended sweeping reforms to Victoria’s integrity laws.
Allan agreed to give the Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (Ibac) follow-the-dollar powers to investigate the spending of public money by private contractors and subcontractors, as well as a broader definition of corrupt conduct, which will make it easier to launch investigations and hold public hearings.
But for some Labor MPs, it felt like too little too late.
Ibac has been seeking many of these powers for a decade and it comes almost two years after allegations of union corruption on Victorian government projects first emerged, followed by a steady stream of damaging headlines about bikies, drugs and strippers on construction sites.
If Labor wins the November election, the reforms won’t be legislated until late 2027. If the opposition wins, it will introduce follow-the-money powers in December but is yet to commit to changing the definition of corruption.
Several Labor MPs, unauthorised to speak publicly, say the premier should have acted months ago – particularly after the release of a report that suggested union corruption could have cost taxpayers up to $15bn.
“It could have cauterised an issue that was causing us to bleed votes,” one said.
Sign up for the Breaking News Australia emailThe second test involved Victoria’s donation laws – or rather, the lack of them. Since the high court struck down an entire section of the Electoral Act in April, removing the previous cap of $4,970 over a four-year term, there have been no limits or disclosure requirements on political donations.
Electoral laws have traditionally been negotiated across party lines to avoid accusations that one side is rewriting the rules for their advantage. But Allan said Labor was forced to strike a deal with the Greens and crossbench MPs – imposing a $7,500 donation cap per donor over four years, reintroducing disclosure measures and increasing public funding – after negotiations with the Liberal leader, Jess Wilson, and shadow attorney general, James Newbury, stalled.
It opened a door to fierce criticism from the opposition, who called the bill “rigged”, “dodgy”, “shonky” and a “dirty racket” during debate. The deputy Liberal leader, David Southwick, went even further, accusing the government of attempting to “steal an election”.
The Coalition claimed Labor would continue to benefit from union affiliation fees and increased administrative funding. But union fees can’t be used for campaigning and the Coalition also benefits from an increase in administrative funding.
Despite the bill passing on Friday morning following a marathon debate – the issue won’t go away – the independent candidate Paul Hopper, who successfully challenged the original laws alongside Melissa Lowe, said he had engaged lawyers to challenge the new laws, while the Coalition is also considering its legal options.
Climate 200 founder Simon Holmes à Court argues the caps will disproportionately disadvantage challengers. Independent candidates Sophie Torney and Shima Ibuki, who received significant donations from Climate 200 during the limbo period when no donation laws were in place, both confirmed they will now have to return those funds or risk breaching the law.
“This leaves my campaign bankrupt, while the major parties are filling their election war chests with taxpayers’ money,” Ibuki said.
Hence then, the article about regrettable references and claims of rigged election laws why this week has reignited jacinta allan spill rumours was published today ( ) and is available on NY Times News ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Regrettable references and claims of ‘rigged’ election laws: why this week has reignited Jacinta Allan spill rumours )
Also on site :