A neo-Nazi group, which is aiming to start a political party and was last week banned as a hate group, has launched legal action against the commonwealth that will test the constitutional validity of the prohibition.
The federal government on Friday banned neo-Nazi group the National Socialist Network (NSN), also known as White Australia, by listing it as a prohibited hate group under legislation passed in the wake of December’s Bondi beach terror attack.
The group had declared it would disband in the hours before the legislation was introduced at a special sitting of parliament in January.
But the minster for home affairs, Tony Burke, said on Friday that the group had instead “phoenixed” and its members had continued organising.
Burke said the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (Asio) had recommended in April that the government consider listing White Australia. That same month, the group lodged an application with the Australian Electoral Commission to register as a political party.
The solicitor Matthew Hopkins, who has previously represented NSN leader Thomas Sewell, filed a legal challenge on Friday in the high court of Australia against the commonwealth over the law used to enforce the ban. Hopkins was acting on behalf of Sewell and the group’s planned political party, the White Australia Party.
Court documents state that on 13 January, the NSN and the Australian European Movement, “some of whose former members assisted in the formation” of the White Australia Party, “disbanded voluntarily”. But the documents state that the party did not dissolve and note Sewell is the president.
The neo-Nazi group is arguing the law used to ban it is invalid on the grounds the legislation “burdens the freedom of governmental and political communication” and violates constitution by conferring punitive power to the government without judicial review.
The group argues the commonwealth lacks the power to proscribe a political party and doing so contravenes the Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth high court decision of 1951, which found a Menzies government attempt to outlaw the communist party was beyond the parliament’s power.
“The challenged provisions, in short, operates as a doorway to tyranny, by empowering the executive to name, suppress and criminalise political opponents and opposing views,” Sewell and the White Australia Party state in the court documents.
The group has submitted separately to the constitutional challenge an application requesting that the court issue an order restraining the commonwealth from using the law until a determination by the court.
Hence then, the article about neo nazi group challenges hate ban by arguing law operates as a doorway to tyranny was published today ( ) and is available on NY Times News ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Neo-Nazi group challenges hate ban by arguing law ‘operates as a doorway to tyranny’ )
Also on site :
- Texas Roadhouse & Olive Garden among restaurants mandating strict ‘one ring’ policy for diner safety
- Alec Baldwin hits back at Elon Musk for criticizing Lupita Nyong’o’s looks amid ‘The Odyssey’ casting
- 90 minutos para el infarto: todo lo que se define en la última jornada de las ligas de España, Inglaterra e Italia