The litigation, which alleges that social media platforms have been purposefully cultivating addiction among adolescents, has been working its way through the courts since 2022. But the details laid out in this new court filing, and reported recently by Time, contain genuinely horrifying claims about Zuckerberg’s Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. And they suggest that—in addition to the tort claims being pursued by the families, school districts, and state attorneys general behind this multidistrict litigation—the corporate executives responsible for these harms could and should be criminally prosecuted for child endangerment.
Perhaps most relevant to state child endangerment laws, the plaintiffs have alleged that Meta knew that millions of adults were using its platforms to inappropriately contact minors. According to their filing, an internal company audit found that Instagram had recommended 1.4 million potentially inappropriate adults to teenagers in a single day in 2022. The brief also details how Instagram’s policy was to not take action against sexual solicitation until a user had been caught engaging in the “trafficking of humans for sex” a whopping 17 times. As Instagram’s former head of safety and well-being, Vaishnavi Jayakumar, reportedly testified, “You could incur 16 violations for prostitution and sexual solicitation, and upon the seventeenth violation, your account would be suspended.”
If your social media platform is facilitating so many inappropriate interactions between adult strangers and children that you need a shorthand to describe such encounters, then you should be liable for some of the resulting harm. But could that liability extend to the criminal sphere?
While child endangerment laws were not originally written with social media companies in mind—Massachusetts’s law was passed in 2002 as a response to the Catholic sex abuse scandal—that state’s highest court made clear that the statute’s text encompasses any and all reckless conduct that creates a substantial risk of harming a child, noting, “If the Legislature had intended a narrower set of protections, it readily could have drafted the statute to accomplish that more limited objective.” Indeed, the threats allegedly facilitated by Meta are far more severe than many of the hazards—like exposing children to marijuana smoke or leaving them unsupervised in a house—that Massachusetts courts have deemed appropriately dangerous to constitute the crime of child endangerment in the past.
First, there is a chance that current civil litigation against social media giants may end up failing. The biggest obstacle these lawsuits face is a 1996 federal law called the Communication Decency Act. Section 230 of this law grants digital communications platforms a broad waiver of civil liability for the user-generated content they host. While plaintiffs are seeking to get around this shield with new litigation strategies—the suits discussed here focus on social media companies’ negligence in the design of their platforms and deception about the known harms of their products, rather than the actual content itself—it’s unclear whether this product-liability theory will succeed in piercing the immunity afforded thus far by Section 230.
Second, criminal prosecution could be a highly effective tool for forcing these companies to adopt more pro-social practices. Meta earned over $62 billion in net profits in 2024. Even a massive, multibillion-dollar settlement or civil judgment could potentially be swallowed by the company as the price of doing business. But I can guarantee that Zuckerberg does not want to spend any time in a state prison. Even the credible threat of a multiyear sentence for these corporate executives might be enough to significantly change Meta’s decision-making, in a way that few other remedies could.
Every day, in jurisdictions all across the country, people are prosecuted and incarcerated for committing the crime of child endangerment based on conduct that was far less aware, and resulted in much less harm, than what is being alleged of Meta’s corporate leadership. If the claims against these companies are true, then executives like Zuckerberg have absolutely engaged in reckless conduct that has created a substantial risk of harming young people. In other words, they have committed crimes—and the mere fact that they are wealthy and powerful should not allow them to escape accountability. Local prosecutors have a chance to win justice for teenage victims who have been endangered by these profit-seeking tech titans. Here’s hoping they take the opportunity.
Hence then, the article about arrest mark zuckerberg for child endangerment was published today ( ) and is available on The New Republic ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Arrest Mark Zuckerberg for Child Endangerment )
Also on site :