That's because Grammarly is introducing an overhauled experience for both free and paid users today. The immediate change you'll notice is the new UI, "docs," Grammarly's new take on a word processor. (The company calls this an "AI writing surface.") Like before, you can use rich text (bolding, italics, and underlining), headers, and lists, but as TechCrunch notes, the new writing interface works using blocks. You can add new blocks to add rich text, but also blocks to add things like separators, columns, and tables. It sounds to me like if you've used WordPress, you'll be familiar with this setup.
Reader Reactions: Identifies the target reader of your work, and anticipates questions or concerns they might want from your current draft.
Citation Finder: Not only is this agent supposed to generate your citations for you, Grammarly says it can find evidence to support or dispute claims in your writing.
Proofreader: This sounds like more of the traditional Grammarly experience, offering line-by-line advice for improving your writing,
Plagiarism Checker: Compares your writing against "vast databases" of text to see if you're infringing on any existing work.
While all writers can use these tools, Grammarly seems keen to target education with these updates. In the company's view, students can use the AI tools to improve their writing, especially in relation to the target audience—say a teacher or instructor's expectations. The company wants teachers, on the other hand, to use tools like AI Detector to weed out any students that might be relying a bit too much on AI tools. In Grammarly's world, students and teachers can use AI for good, not cheating.
I also worry about the quality and accuracy of other tools. "Reader Reactions" relies on "publicly available" information about a given instructor. If a classroom of students follows AI advice generated from the same pool of data about this instructor, will the end results all sound exactly the same? AI also hallucinates, occasionally making up information entirely—will students take the time to review "Citation Finder's" generations, to ensure that some of the sources aren't bogus?
I get Grammarly's mission here: AI isn't going away, and students are increasingly using it in ways that might not necessarily help them learn. Rather than attempt to ban AI, why not embrace the technology, in a way that is beneficial to everyone involved? I do appreciate Grammarly isn't offering students a way to generate whole paragraphs (or essays), but rather use the AI to engage with their existing work. But we also need to be wary of these tools limitations, something that often goes overlooked in all the AI hype and excitement.
Hence then, the article about grammarly is rolling out a new interface and more ai tools was published today ( ) and is available on Live Hacker ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Grammarly Is Rolling Out a New Interface and More AI Tools )
Also on site :