Attorneys on both sides of a federal class action lawsuit that aims to induce sweeping reforms at San Diego County jails presented their arguments Thursday before a federal judge.
They clashed over what evidence might be admitted at the upcoming trial regarding the jails, which have long faced scrutiny over a high rate of deaths for inmates.
The lawsuit seeks to correct alleged failures in the system’s policies and procedures, which attorneys say are deficient and have led directly to numerous deaths.
Plaintiffs’ attorneys, representing a class encompassing all county inmates, are seeking to have some of San Diego County’s expert witnesses disqualified from testifying in the trial, which is anticipated to last anywhere from two to three months.
Meanwhile, county lawyers are seeking to have the majority of the plaintiffs’ claims dismissed from the case as they’ve argued sufficient improvements have been put in place the address the plaintiffs’ concerns.
U.S. District Judge Anthony Battaglia took the matter under submission at the conclusion of Thursday’s hearing. Battaglia said he would issue a written ruling “as soon as possible.”
Van Swearingen, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, said that among the alleged inadequacies in the system are low staffing levels, leading directly to poor medical care, inoperable monitoring equipment that he said led to late responses to ultimately fatal emergencies and a substandard system for classifying inmates, causing violent and nonviolent offenders to sometimes be placed together or other inmates placed in solitary confinement without justification.
Regarding staffing levels, Swearingen spoke of two inmate deaths, in which the decedents “effectively starved to death.”
Elizabeth Pappy, one of the attorneys representing the county, argued the plaintiffs hadn’t shown a direct, evidence-based connection between specific fatal incidents in the jails and a widespread, systemic issue that would require a major overhaul of the jails.
Swearingen disagreed, saying the county jail deaths referenced in their papers “aren’t idiosyncratic anecdotes. They are evident of a systematic problem in the jail.”
While the plaintiffs allege the county’s witnesses, who wrote declarations attesting to apparent improvements in the jails, performed inadequate or flawed reviews of the county’s lockups, Pappy argued that the credibility of those witnesses can be examined through their testimony, rather than excluded outright from the trial.
A California State Auditor’s report issued in 2022 concluded there were “deficiencies with how the sheriff’s department provides care for and protects incarcerated individuals (that) likely contributed to in-custody deaths.”
That audit examined 185 deaths within the San Diego County jail system from 2006 through 2020, a rate that was among the highest in the state during that time period.
Hence then, the article about attorneys clash over expert testimony more in class action case over san diego jail deaths was published today ( ) and is available on Times of San Diego ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Attorneys clash over expert testimony, more in class-action case over San Diego jail deaths )
Also on site :