Supreme Court allowing significant cuts to the Education Department under the Trump administration marks a pivotal moment in U.S. educational policy. By permitting a reduction of the department's workforce by approximately one-third, this decision facilitates a broader strategy aimed at downsizing federal government operations . The administration's approach, spearheaded by Education Secretary Linda McMahon, is framed as an effort to enhance efficiency and accountability within education governance. However, this has sparked extensive legal challenges from various stakeholders including states and teachers' unions who contend that such drastic reductions will adversely affect schools and students.
The order is a significant victory for the administration and could ease President Trump’s efforts to sharply curtail the federal government’s role in the nation’s schools.
Trump administration has announced plans to fire more than 1,300 workers, a move that would effectively gut the department, which manages federal loans for college, tracks student achievement and enforces civil rights laws in schools.
The Education Department began the year with more than 4,000 employees. The administration also fired some probationary workers and offered employees the ability to resign. Altogether, after the terminations, the Education Department will have a work force of about half the size it did before Mr. Trump returned to office.
Since taking office, the administration has sought to lay off half of the agency’s workforce and transfer some of its core functions, such as managing student loans, to other federal departments.  
Myong Joun blocked those efforts in May and ruled that Trump needed congressional authorization, ordering him to reinstate the roughly 1,400 workers who had been laid off two months prior.
The Justice Department said the Constitution gives the executive branch, not the courts, the authority to decide how many employees are needed.
"The Department of Education has determined that it can carry out its statutorily mandated functions with a pared-down staff and that many discretionary functions are better left to the States," Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court.
This decision is emblematic of the Trump administration's strategy to dismantle various federal departments and return functions to state control. Proponents of this approach argue that localized governance can lead to more effective educational outcomes by allowing states greater autonomy over their education systems . However, critics contend that such drastic measures risk undermining vital resources and support structures for students across the nation.
Read more
US president is going to send urbane missiles to Ukraine Gunman Opens Fire at Kentucky Church, Killing Two Women After Shooting Officer
Sara H
Also on site :
- ‘You just admitted that you work there’: Vegas woman receives text from stranger. Then she realizes he stole number from her Planet Fitness profile
- ‘The entitlement of people with kids baffles me’: Woman settles into her first-class seat on flight. Then a mom approaches her
- ‘I’m carrying 50 pounds of wet hot cheese’: Brewster Street Icehouse worker in Texas takes leftover cheese to the dumpster. Then she tosses it in