According to Midjourney, this is another step toward producing an AI tool that's capable of producing a real-time, 3D world simulator. The V1 model has been released with that ultimate goal in mind, though it's going to take a while to get there.
As usual with Midjourney, this content creation will cost you time (the Midjourney version of credits): A second of video is the same cost as an image generation, and Midjourney plans start at $10 a month and go up from there.
Creating videos in Midjourney
As usual, Midjourney presents you with several results from your prompt, together with options for building on them. Included in these are now four animation options for creating a video. Your first decision is whether to go with Auto (Midjourney chooses the motion that's added) or Manual (you describe the motion you want).
Click on any of the generated videos, and you'll see the same four animation options are here, only these are now for extending the video further—which you can do four times in total. You can mix up auto and manual sections, and low-motion and high-motion sections, to build up the clip you're looking for.
You'll find the options for downloading your video up above the prompt on the right: You can download the raw video or a version optimized for social media (which combats some of the compression that happens when you post videos to those platforms). You can start again by clicking on the original prompt, then making changes to it.
You can see both the limitations and advantages of the Midjourney approach in these clips: Each four-second segment moves smoothly into the next, but you don't get much time to do what you want to do in your video if you're working in four-second bursts, and as the video progresses you do tend to lose some of the detail and richness that you get in your original image.
Comparing Midjourney to Sora and Gemini
I got Sora to build on the futuristic sci-fi city and animated landscape images I'd created in Midjourney, and got mixed results. The scene felt more engaging but there were more oddities in it, such as unnatural movements and glitchy backgrounds (especially with the animation, which got really weird).
You can use Sora to generate videos up to 20 seconds in length, but there's less control over how a scene progresses than there is with Midjourney: You basically just enter your prompt and then take whatever you get back. For casual projects, at least, Midjourney feels like the more accessible tool, capable of more realistic results.
You can see that the flying car does descend in a believable way through the cityscape, and the prompt instructions are followed closely. As for the animation, flying across a cartoon-ish landscape, the results from Google Flow and Veo 2 were the best of the bunch—though again you can see that you gradually lose some of the richness and detail present in the original image.
While this isn't the biggest sample size, the quality of the Midjourney clips is clear to see, and the approach to video making is straightforward and intuitive. Google Veo 2 remains a better choice for overall quality, while for now Sora remains rather chaotic and unpredictable. You're going to have to spend a lot more time with the OpenAI model to end up with passable results.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( I Tried Midjourney’s AI Video Generator, and It’s Better Than I Expected )
Also on site :