Influencer parents who monetize their minor children on social media are receiving heightened scrutiny lately. Several high-profile controversies, including the arrest of former family vlogger Ruby Franke on charges of aggravated child abuse, have highlighted the dark and exploitative side of family vlogging. Now that some children who grew up on YouTube, including Ruby’s daughter, Shari Franke, are speaking out about the dangers of vlogging, attitudes are slowly shifting. States like Utah and California have taken small steps to set up legal protections for child influencers, similar to the protections for child actors, including requiring parents to pay their kids. However, these laws still don’t get to the root of the problem: children can’t consent to having their lives put on social media. There’s also the fear that parents will find loopholes to avoid compensating their kids or maybe even turn to more obscure platforms and practices, such as SuperFanVerse.
Hence then, the article about influencer parents use superfanverse to sell photos and videos of their children to potential predators was published today ( ) and is available on The Mary sue ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Influencer parents use SuperFanVerse to sell photos and videos of their children to potential predators )
Also on site :
- Couple flies Allegiant to Disney World. They have a trick for getting around the ‘one carry-on’ policy—without paying bag fees. Here’s how
- Sex Pistols announce Anarchy in the UK tour to celebrate 50 years of punk
- Why the TV industry keeps falling in love with the Kennedys, America’s answer to the royal family