What the Supreme Court Keeps Getting Wrong About the Meaning of a ‘Well Regulated Militia’ ...Middle East

On Nov. 7, the Supreme Court will debate whether a drug dealer in Texas with a history of armed violence is entitled to own a gun under the Second Amendment. United States v. Rahimi is the latest in a series of cases that have transformed the legalities of gun ownership in America. Beginning with District of Columbia v. Heller in 2008, the Court has interpreted a phrase long-understood as protecting the state militias as conferring a personal right to own a gun. It was, wrote Justice Paul Stevens in a blistering dissent, “a dramatic upheaval in the law.” [time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”] But Heller was just the start. The Court has since struck down handgun regulations in Chicago

Hence then, the article about what the supreme court keeps getting wrong about the meaning of a well regulated militia was published today ( Tuesday 07/11/2023 - 04:37 PM ) and is available on Time ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.

Read More Details
Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( What the Supreme Court Keeps Getting Wrong About the Meaning of a ‘Well Regulated Militia’ )

Also on site :

• HBO Max Moves Up Forthcoming Episodes Of ‘Industry,’ ‘A Knight Of The Seven Kingdoms’ Ahead Of Super Bowl
• Why Did Taylor Swift Skip the 2026 Grammy Awards? Fans Are Disappointed
• Donald Trump Slams Grammys as ‘Unwatchable’ and Calls Trevor Noah a ‘Total Loser’ Over Trump-Epstein Island Joke: ‘It Looks Like I’ll Be Sending My Lawyers to Sue This Pathetic Dope’