The Supreme Court is hearing arguments today in Pulsifer v. United States, one of the most important criminal law cases in recent memory. The issue in Pulsifer is very specific: the meaning of the word “and” in an obscure federal statute. But the consequences are massive. If the court rules against the government, then thousands more federal defendants each year can avoid federal drug laws’ draconian mandatory minimum sentences. Since the 1980s, people convicted of federal drug crimes have been subject to 10-year mandatory-minimum sentences for relatively modest amounts of drugs. If you transport one kilogram of heroin, 280 grams of crack cocaine or just 50 grams of methamphetamine,
Hence then, the article about the fate of thousands depends on the supreme court s interpretation of the word and was published today ( ) and is available onThe Hill ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( The fate of thousands depends on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the word ‘and’ )