Joseph Muniz was convicted by the State of Michigan for the 2004 shooting of Pedro Gutierrez. (Gutierrez was shot twice, but survived.) Muniz was sentenced to many years in prison. He unsuccessfully appealed his conviction. So, with time on his hands, he decided to challenge his conviction in federal court, using the process known as habeas corpus, which allows federal courts to review state convictions after they’ve become final, to ensure that everything was fair. Muniz argued that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel because his attorney fell asleep during his trial. If that argument sounds vaguely familiar, it probably should. The “Case of the Sleeping Lawyer” wasn’t an
Hence then, the article about judicial follies for in that sleep in court was published today ( ) and is available onUkiah Daily Journal ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Judicial Follies: For in that sleep in court )