When the covid-19 pandemic hit, Dr. Corey Siegel was more prepared than most of his peers. Half of Siegel’s patients — many with private insurance and Medicaid — were already using telehealth, logging onto appointments through phones or computers. “You get to meet their family members; you get to meet their pets,” Siegel said. “You see more into their lives than you do when they come to you.” Siegel’s Medicare patients weren’t covered for telehealth visits until the pandemic drove Congress and regulators to temporarily pay for remote medical treatment just as they would in-person care. Siegel, section chief for gastroenterology and hepatology at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medica
Hence then, the article about it s telehealth vs no care doctors say congress risks leaving patients vulnerable was published today ( ) and is available onKHN ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( It’s ‘Telehealth vs. No Care’: Doctors Say Congress Risks Leaving Patients Vulnerable )