Lauren Boebert seems to think that just because the House of Representatives is at a standstill, so is the entire U.S. government.The far-right Colorado representative spent all Tuesday trying to spin the six consecutive fruitless votes for speaker of the House as a win, insisting that if Congress wasn’t able to do anything, then it couldn’t spend money.But as MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle pointed out, that’s not the case at all.Any legislation passed in the previous Congress, such as the enormous $1.7 trillion omnibus spending package, is already in motion. Just because the House is completely dysfunctional now doesn’t put that funding on hold.It’s worth noting that federal spending also cover
Hence then, the article about lauren boebert says no house speaker means congress isn t spending money that s not true was published today ( ) and is available onThe New Republic ( Middle East ) The editorial team at PressBee has edited and verified it, and it may have been modified, fully republished, or quoted. You can read and follow the updates of this news or article from its original source.
Read More Details Finally We wish PressBee provided you with enough information of ( Lauren Boebert Says No House Speaker Means Congress Isn’t Spending Money (That’s Not True) )